CVE-2023-36752
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0). The upgrade-app URL parameter in the web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation. This could allow an authenticated privileged remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe upgrade-app URL parameter in the web interface of RUGGEDCOM ROX devices lacks server-side input sanitization, allowing an authenticated privileged attacker to inject OS commands that execute with root privileges. This is a direct command injection vulnerability in the firmware upgrade functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.16.0< 2.16.0< 2.16.0< 2.16.0< 2.16.0< 2.16.0< 2.16.0< 2.16.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the RUGGEDCOM ROX device modelAccess the device web interface or use the CLI command 'show version' to determine the exact model (Mx5000, Mx5000re, Rx1400, Rx1500, Rx1501, Rx1510, Rx1511, or Rx1512)Affected if The device model is any of the eight affected models listed in the CVE
-
Determine the installed firmware versionIn the web interface, navigate to System > Device Information or use the CLI command 'show version' to read the firmware version installed on the deviceAffected if The firmware version is below 2.16.0
-
Confirm web interface is enabledCheck if the web interface (HTTP/HTTPS) is listening by accessing the device IP in a browser or using a port scanner against ports 80 and 443Affected if The web interface is accessible on the network
-
Verify the upgrade-app functionality existsAttempt to access the firmware upgrade page in the web interface, typically found under Administration > Firmware Upgrade or System > UpgradeAffected if The firmware upgrade functionality is present and accessible to authenticated users
A user is affected if they have a RUGGEDCOM ROX device (any of the eight listed models) running firmware below version 2.16.0 with the web interface accessible on the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.16.0
Upgrade affected devices to firmware version V2.16.0 or later. Restrict web interface access to trusted networks and ensure privileged accounts use strong, unique credentials to reduce attack surface.
V2.16.0 or later
- 1. Identify the current firmware version of the Ruggedcom ROX device by accessing the web interface or checking via CLI.
- 2. Navigate to the Siemens industrial security portal at cert-portal.siemens.com to download the fixed firmware version V2.16.0 or later for your specific device model.
- 3. Review the Siemens upgrade instructions for Ruggedcom ROX devices before proceeding with the update.
- 4. Apply the firmware upgrade to the affected device through the web interface or management console, following the documented upgrade procedure.
- 5. After upgrading, verify that the firmware version is now V2.16.0 or later.
- 6. Confirm that the upgrade-app functionality is now properly sanitized and the command injection vulnerability is resolved.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-36752 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-36752 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data