CVE-2023-36754
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0). The SCEP server configuration URL parameter in the web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation. This could allow an authenticated privileged remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA command injection vulnerability exists in the SCEP server configuration URL parameter of the RUGGEDCOM ROX web interface. Due to missing server-side input sanitization, an authenticated privileged attacker can inject arbitrary shell commands through the URL parameter, which execute with root privileges on the underlying Linux system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.16.0< 2.16.0< 2.16.0< 2.16.0< 2.16.0< 2.16.0< 2.16.0< 2.16.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device model and firmware versionAccess the RUGGEDCOM ROX web interface and navigate to the System > Firmware or About page to view the installed firmware version. Alternatively, use the CLI command 'show version' or equivalent to retrieve the firmware version.Affected if The firmware version is below 2.16.0 (e.g., V2.15.x, V2.14.x, etc.)
-
Confirm device model is in affected product listCheck the device model identification in the web interface System Information or on the physical device label. The affected models are: MX5000, MX5000RE, RX1400, RX1500, RX1501, RX1510, RX1511, RX1512.Affected if The device is one of the listed models with firmware < 2.16.0
-
Verify SCEP server feature is enabledNavigate to the SCEP server configuration section in the RUGGEDCOM ROX web interface (typically under PKI or Certificate settings). Check if the SCEP server is configured and enabled.Affected if The SCEP server feature is enabled and a URL parameter is configurable for the SCEP server endpoint
-
Check web interface accessibilityAttempt to access the RUGGEDCOM ROX web interface over HTTPS/HTTP. The vulnerability requires an authenticated privileged attacker, so verify whether remote web management is accessible.Affected if The web interface is accessible from a network where untrusted authenticated users could connect
You are affected if your RUGGEDCOM ROX device (MX5000, MX5000RE, RX1400, RX1500, RX1501, RX1510, RX1511, or RX1512) runs firmware version below 2.16.0, has the SCEP server feature enabled, and the web interface is accessible to authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.16.0
Upgrade all affected RUGGEDCOM ROX devices (MX5000, MX5000RE, RX1400, RX1500, RX1501, RX1510, RX1511, RX1512, RX1524, RX1536, RX5000) to firmware version V2.16.0 or later to remediate this vulnerability.
V2.16.0
- 1. Identify the specific Ruggedcom ROX device model from the affected list (MX5000, MX5000RE, RX1400, RX1500, RX1501, RX1510, RX1511, RX1512).
- 2. Obtain the fixed firmware version V2.16.0 or later from the Siemens industrial security portal or official support channels (cert-portal.siemens.com).
- 3. Review the device's firmware upgrade documentation for the specific model to understand the upgrade procedure.
- 4. Back up the current device configuration according to Siemens backup procedures.
- 5. Upload the V2.16.0 firmware to the device through the web interface or management interface as documented.
- 6. After upgrade, verify the SCEP server configuration parameter now properly sanitizes input.
- 7. Confirm the device is running firmware version V2.16.0 or later.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-36754 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-36754 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data