RedisDatabase / datastore

CVE-2023-36824

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-07-11
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 7.0.12 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
High EPSS Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Redis is an in-memory database that persists on disk. In Redit 7.0 prior to 7.0.12, extracting key names from a command and a list of arguments may, in some cases, trigger a heap overflow and result in reading random heap memory, heap corruption and potentially remote code execution. Several scenarios that may lead to authenticated users executing a specially crafted `COMMAND GETKEYS` or `COMMAND GETKEYSANDFLAGS`and authenticated users who were set with ACL rules that match key names, executing a specially crafted command that refers to a variadic list of key names. The vulnerability is patched in Redis 7.0.12.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Redis 7.0 versions prior to 7.0.12 contain a heap overflow vulnerability in the key extraction logic used by COMMAND GETKEYS and COMMAND GETKEYSANDFLAGS commands, as well as in ACL rule matching for variadic key name arguments. This allows authenticated users to trigger heap corruption and potentially achieve remote code execution by executing specially crafted commands that cause the key name extraction to overflow its buffer.

MitigationUpgrade Redis to version 7.0.12 or later to patch the vulnerability. There are no reliable workarounds; upgrading is the only effective mitigation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
RedisDatabase / datastore
Affected:>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.12
FedoraOperating system
Affected:= 37= 38

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Redis version
    Run `redis-server --version` or `redis-cli INFO server` to retrieve the Redis version number
    Affected if Version is 7.0.0 or higher but below 7.0.12
  2. Verify Redis is running with COMMAND GETKEYS enabled
    Run `redis-cli COMMAND GETKEYS` to confirm the command is available to authenticated clients
    Affected if The command executes successfully without error, indicating it is accessible to authenticated users
  3. Check for ACL-defined users with variadic key patterns
    Run `redis-cli ACL LIST` and examine ACL rules for patterns containing multiple key names or key wildcard expressions in the selector rules
    Affected if ACL rules contain user definitions with variadic key name arguments that could trigger the affected key name extraction logic

Your environment is affected if you run Redis version 7.0.0 through 7.0.11 and have authenticated users who can execute COMMAND GETKEYS/COMMAND GETKEYSANDFLAGS or use ACL rules with variadic key name arguments.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 7.0.12 or later
Fixed in 7.0.12
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Redis to version 7.0.12 or later to patch the vulnerability. There are no reliable workarounds; upgrading is the only effective mitigation.

Recommended fix High confidence

Redis 7.0.12 (or latest stable 7.x release)

  1. Identify current Redis version using 'redis-server --version' or 'redis-cli INFO'
  2. If running Redis 7.0.0-7.0.11, upgrade to Redis 7.0.12 or later
  3. For Fedora systems, run 'sudo dnf update redis' to apply available security updates
  4. After upgrade, restart the Redis service: 'sudo systemctl restart redis'
  5. Verify the new version is running: 'redis-cli INFO | grep redis_version'

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Redis Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,720
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-36824 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-36824 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data