CVE-2023-36838
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability in the flow processing daemon (flowd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series allows a local, authenticated attacker with low privileges, to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). If a low privileged user executes a specific CLI command, flowd which is responsible for traffic forwarding in SRX crashes and generates a core dump. This will cause temporary traffic interruption until the flowd process is restarted automatically. Continued execution of this command will lead to a sustained DoS. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series: All versions prior to 20.2R3-S7; 20.3 version 20.3R1 and later versions; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S6; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S5; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S4; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S4; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-S3; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3-S1; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R3; 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R2; 22.4 versions prior to 22.4R1-S1, 22.4R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOut-of-bounds read vulnerability in the flow processing daemon (flowd) on Juniper SRX Series firewalls. A low-privileged, authenticated local attacker can trigger the vulnerability by executing a specific CLI command, causing the flowd process to crash and generate a core dump, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 20.2= 20.2= 20.3= 20.4= 21.1= 21.2= 21.3= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelRun 'show chassis hardware' or check the physical device to confirm it is a Juniper SRX Series firewallAffected if The device is not an SRX Series firewall (the vulnerability only affects SRX devices)
-
Check the Junos OS versionRun 'show version' or 'show version detail' to obtain the installed Junos versionAffected if The installed version matches one of these: any version before 20.2, or exactly 20.2, 20.3, 20.4, 21.1, 21.2, 21.3, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, or 22.4
-
Verify flowd process is runningRun 'show system processes extensive | match flowd' or check process status via 'request system process restart' to confirm the flowd daemon is activeAffected if flowd is not running (the vulnerability only triggers when flowd is active and processing traffic)
-
Look for flowd crash indicatorsRun 'show system core-dumps' and review /var/crash/ for recent core dump files related to flowdAffected if A recent core dump exists for the flowd process, indicating a crash from this vulnerability
A user is affected if they have a Juniper SRX device running a vulnerable Junos version where the flowd process has crashed from the specific CLI trigger.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.2
Apply the vendor-supplied patches for your specific Junos OS version (20.2R3-S7 and later, 20.4R3-S6, 21.1R3-S5, 21.2R3-S4, 21.3R3-S4, 21.4R3-S3, 22.1R3-S1, 22.2R3, 22.3R2, 22.4R1-S1, 22.4R2 or later).
22.4R2 or later (or the equivalent S-release for your branch: 20.2R3-S7, 20.4R3-S6, 21.1R3-S5, 21.2R3-S4, 21.3R3-S4, 21.4R3-S3, 22.1R3-S1, 22.2R3, 22.3R2)
- 1. Back up the current Junos OS configuration using 'request system snapshot' or network-based backup
- 2. Verify the current version with 'show version'
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS release for your SRX Series device from Juniper Networks support portal
- 4. Upload the Junos OS upgrade package to the device's /var/tmp directory
- 5. Install the upgrade using 'request system software add /var/tmp/<junos-file>.tgz no-validate'
- 6. Reboot the device using 'request system reboot'
- 7. After reboot, verify the new version with 'show version' and confirm the flowd process is running normally
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-36838 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-36838 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data