CVE-2023-36841
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (pfe) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series allows a unauthenticated network-based attacker to cause an infinite loop, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). An attacker who sends malformed TCP traffic via an interface configured with PPPoE, causes an infinite loop on the respective PFE. This results in consuming all resources and a manual restart is needed to recover. This issue affects interfaces with PPPoE configured and tcp-mss enabled. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS * All versions prior to 20.4R3-S7; * 21.1 version 21.1R1 and later versions; * 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S6; * 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S5; * 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-S3; * 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3-S4; * 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R3; * 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R2-S2; * 22.4 versions prior to 22.4R2;
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series allows an unauthenticated network attacker to cause an infinite loop by sending malformed TCP traffic through interfaces configured with PPPoE and tcp-mss enabled. This consumes all PFE resources and requires a manual device restart to recover.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 20.4= 20.4= 21.1= 21.2= 21.3= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Junos OS versionRun 'show version' or 'show version detail' to obtain the installed Junos OS versionAffected if The version matches any of these: < 20.4, 20.4, 21.1, 21.2, 21.3, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4 (compare your installed version to these affected ranges)
-
Confirm device is MX SeriesRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show version' to identify the hardware model; MX Series platforms include MX5, MX10, MX40, MX80, MX104, MX240, MX480, MX960, and virtual MX (vMX)Affected if The device is an MX Series router
-
Check for PPPoE interface configurationRun 'show configuration interfaces | display set | match pppoe' to search for PPPoE-related interface configuration in the active configAffected if Any interfaces are configured with PPPoE (protocol pppoe)
-
Verify tcp-mss is enabled on PPPoE interfacesRun 'show configuration interfaces <interface-name> unit <unit> family inet filter input <filter-name>' and look for 'tcp-mss' in any firewall filter applied to PPPoE interfaces; alternatively, search the config with 'show configuration | match tcp-mss'Affected if tcp-mss is configured in a firewall filter applied to PPPoE interfaces
-
Check for PFE resource exhaustion symptomsRun 'show chassis fpc' and 'show pfe statistics traffic' to monitor PFE CPU and memory utilization; look for sustained high utilization or increasing error countersAffected if PFE resources are fully consumed or showing abnormal traffic patterns indicative of an infinite loop
You are affected if your MX Series device runs a vulnerable Junos version (20.4 through 22.4) AND has PPPoE interfaces with tcp-mss enabled, and you observe PFE resource exhaustion from malformed TCP traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.4
Upgrade Junos OS to a fixed version (21.1R1+, 21.2R3-S6+, 21.3R3-S5+, 21.4R3-S3+, 22.1R3-S4+, 22.2R3+, 22.3R2-S2+, or 22.4R2+) as listed in the vendor advisory; no explicit workarounds are mentioned in the description.
20.4R3-S7, 21.2R3-S6, 21.3R3-S5, 21.4R3-S3, 22.1R3-S4, 22.2R3, 22.3R2-S2, or 22.4R2 (depending on desired maintenance branch)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version running on the MX Series device using 'show version'
- 2. Identify the maintenance branch currently in use (e.g., 20.4, 21.1, 21.2, 21.3, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, or 22.4)
- 3. Upgrade to the minimum fixed version for that branch: 20.4R3-S7, 21.2R3-S6, 21.3R3-S5, 21.4R3-S3, 22.1R3-S4, 22.2R3, 22.3R2-S2, or 22.4R2
- 4. After upgrade, verify the device is operational and the PPPoE interfaces are functioning correctly
- 5. Consider upgrading to the most recent stable release within the branch for additional fixes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-36841 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-36841 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data