CVE-2023-36980
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in Ethereum Blockchain v0.1.1+commit.6ff4cd6 cause the balance to be zeroed out when the value of betsize+casino.balance exceeds the threshold.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceIn Ethereum Blockchain v0.1.1+commit.6ff4cd6, a logic vulnerability causes the entire casino balance to be zeroed out when a bet transaction would result in betsize+casino.balance exceeding a threshold. Instead of properly rejecting the bet or enforcing limits, the contract incorrectly wipes the entire balance, leading to potential fund loss.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.1.1\+commit.6ff4cd6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Ethereum Blockchain versionRun `geth version` or check the git commit hash of your Ethereum node installation to verify it matches 0.1.1+commit.6ff4cd6Affected if The installed version is exactly 0.1.1+commit.6ff4cd6
-
Identify casino contract deploymentQuery your blockchain state or deployment logs to determine if a casino-style smart contract has been deployed on your networkAffected if A casino contract exists on your blockchain instance
-
Verify casino balance handlingInspect the casino contract source code or bytecode for logic that handles the condition where betsize plus casino balance exceeds a thresholdAffected if The contract contains threshold comparison logic that could trigger balance zeroing instead of bet rejection
-
Test threshold behaviorSimulate a bet transaction where (betsize + casino.balance) would exceed the threshold and observe the resulting casino balanceAffected if The entire casino balance becomes zero rather than the bet being rejected or limited
You are affected if running Ethereum Blockchain version 0.1.1+commit.6ff4cd6 with a deployed casino contract that exhibits the balance-zeroing behavior when bets exceed the threshold.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataFix the threshold check logic to properly reject or limit bets that would exceed the threshold rather than zeroing the balance; implement proper input validation and error handling.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-36980 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-36980 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data