Aspera FaspexApplication · Ibm

CVE-2023-37401

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.0.14 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.13.1 uses a cross-domain policy file that includes domains that should not be trusted.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Aspera Faspex versions 5.0.0 through 5.0.3.1 includes an overly permissive cross-domain policy file (crossdomain.xml or clientaccesspolicy.xml) that lists domains which should not be trusted, potentially allowing those untrusted domains to make cross-domain requests to the Faspex application.

MitigationReview and restrict the cross-domain policy file to remove untrusted domains, limiting access only to legitimate, controlled domains.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Aspera FaspexApplication
Affected:>= 5.0.0, < 5.0.14

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Aspera Faspex version
    Locate and inspect the Faspex version information, typically found in the application metadata, about page, or version file within the installation directory
    Affected if installed version is >= 5.0.0 and < 5.0.14
  2. Locate cross-domain policy files
    Find crossdomain.xml and clientaccesspolicy.xml files in the Faspex web application root directory or configuration directory
    Affected if policy files exist and contain entries for untrusted domains
  3. Inspect crossdomain.xml contents
    Open and read the crossdomain.xml file, examining the <allow-access-from> elements for any domain entries
    Affected if file contains domain entries that are not trusted or should not have cross-domain access
  4. Inspect clientaccesspolicy.xml contents
    Open and read the clientaccesspolicy.xml file, examining the <access> elements for any domain entries
    Affected if file contains domain entries that are not trusted or should not have cross-domain access
  5. Verify domain trust status
    Review all domains listed in the policy files and compare against a list of known, legitimate, controlled domains for your organization
    Affected if any untrusted or unknown domains are present in the policy files allowing cross-domain requests

User is affected if running Aspera Faspex version 5.0.0 through 5.0.13.x and the crossdomain.xml or clientaccesspolicy.xml file contains untrusted or unknown domains that should not have cross-domain access to the application

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.0.14 or later
Fixed in 5.0.14
Interim mitigation

Review and restrict the cross-domain policy file to remove untrusted domains, limiting access only to legitimate, controlled domains.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.14 or later

  1. Backup current IBM Aspera Faspex configuration and data
  2. Review IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.14 release notes for any specific upgrade requirements
  3. Ensure system meets prerequisites for version 5.0.14
  4. Download IBM Aspera Faspex version 5.0.14 or later from IBM fix central or authorized distribution channel
  5. Stop Aspera Faspex services before upgrade
  6. Perform upgrade following IBM installation/upgrade documentation
  7. Verify cross-domain policy file (crossdomain.xml) no longer contains untrusted domains after upgrade
  8. Restart Aspera Faspex services
Caveat Review release notes for any configuration changes or deprecated features between 5.0.x and 5.0.14

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Aspera Faspex Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,090
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-37401 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-37401 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data