FrroutingApplication

CVE-2023-3748

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-07-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 8.5 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw was found in FRRouting when parsing certain babeld unicast hello messages that are intended to be ignored. This issue may allow an attacker to send specially crafted hello messages with the unicast flag set, the interval field set to 0, or any TLV that contains a sub-TLV with the Mandatory flag set to enter an infinite loop and cause a denial of service.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

FRRouting contains a denial of service vulnerability in its babeld routing daemon where parsing specially crafted unicast hello messages with specific malformed fields (unicast flag set, interval=0, or TLV with Mandatory sub-TLV) triggers an infinite loop, causing the routing process to hang.

MitigationApply the relevant FRRouting security patch or upgrade to a version where this vulnerability has been addressed; additionally, network-level filtering of malformed babel packets can provide interim protection.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FrroutingApplication
Affected:< 8.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if babeld is running
    Run 'ps aux | grep babeld' or 'systemctl status babeld' to see if the babeld process is active
    Affected if babeld process is running and the version is below 8.5
  2. Check installed FRRouting version
    Run 'frr -v' or 'rpm -q frr' (RHEL) or 'dpkg -l frr' (Debian) to retrieve the installed package version
    Affected if version is below 8.5 and babeld is enabled
  3. Verify babel protocol configuration
    Run 'vtysh -c "show babel interface"' to list interfaces with babel enabled
    Affected if any interface has babel protocol configured and the FRRouting version is vulnerable
  4. Check babeld process status
    Run 'vtysh -c "show babel neighbor"' or monitor babeld process with 'top'/'htop' for hung state
    Affected if babeld process is hung or unresponsive and was processing unicast hello packets

A defender is affected if babeld is running on FRRouting version below 8.5 and has babel protocol enabled on any network interface, as malformed unicast hello messages can trigger the infinite loop.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 8.5 or later
Fixed in 8.5
Interim mitigation

Apply the relevant FRRouting security patch or upgrade to a version where this vulnerability has been addressed; additionally, network-level filtering of malformed babel packets can provide interim protection.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

FRRouting 8.5 or later

  1. 1. Backup current FRRouting configuration files (typically in /etc/frr/ or /usr/local/etc/frr/)
  2. 2. Stop the FRRouting services (frr, zebra, babeld, or frr.service depending on your system)
  3. 3. Update your package repository to ensure you have access to the latest packages
  4. 4. Install FRRouting version 8.5 or later using your system's package manager (e.g., apt-get install frr, yum install frr, or dnf install frr)
  5. 5. Verify the installed version matches or exceeds 8.5 (frr -v or frrctl version)
  6. 6. Restore or verify your configuration files are compatible
  7. 7. Start FRRouting services
  8. 8. Monitor babeld daemon logs for any errors or startup issues

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Frrouting Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,790
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,464.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3748 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3748 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data