CVE-2023-37546
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn multiple Codesys products in multiple versions, after successful authentication as a user, specific crafted network communication requests with inconsistent content can cause the CmpApp component to read internally from an invalid address, potentially leading to a denial-of-service condition. This vulnerability is different to CVE-2023-37545, CVE-2023-37547, CVE-2023-37548, CVE-2023-37549 and CVE-2023-37550
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a memory access vulnerability in Codesys industrial control software products. After successful user authentication, a remote attacker can send specially crafted network packets with inconsistent content that cause the CmpApp component to read from an invalid memory address, resulting in potential denial of service. The attack requires authentication but can be exploited over the network.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.10.0.0< 4.10.0.0< 4.10.0.0< 4.10.0.0< 4.10.0.0< 4.10.0.0< 4.10.0.0< 4.10.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Codesys Control productLocate the Codesys runtime installation by checking for directories such as /opt/codesys, /usr/local/codesys, or C:\Program Files\Codesys. Review product documentation or runtime configuration files for the specific Codesys Control variant (e.g., Raspberry Pi, Linux, Beaglebone).Affected if The system is running any of the following Codesys Control products: Beaglebone SL, Empc A/imx6 SL, IoT2000 SL, Linux SL, PFC100 SL, PFC200 SL, PLCnext SL, or Raspberry Pi SL.
-
Determine installed version numberAccess the runtime management interface, check the product About/Version information within the Codesys Development System, or inspect the runtime package version file (typically found in the installation directory). Compare the version to 4.10.0.0.Affected if The installed version is lower than 4.10.0.0.
-
Verify network communication is enabledInspect the Codesys Control runtime network configuration settings. Check if the network adapter is bound and the CODESYS control runtime is listening on network ports (default ports 1217, 1740, 1741). Use netstat or equivalent to list active network listeners.Affected if The runtime has an active network listener and accepts remote connections.
-
Confirm remote authentication is configuredReview the user management and authentication settings in the Codesys Control runtime. Check whether remote users are defined or if the Webvisualization or remote PLC configurations permit authenticated access.Affected if Remote user authentication is enabled or remote access is permitted.
The environment is affected if any Codesys Control product (Beaglebone SL, Empc A/imx6 SL, IoT2000 SL, Linux SL, PFC100 SL, PFC200 SL, PLCnext SL, or Raspberry Pi SL) is running with a version lower than 4.10.0.0 and has network communication with remote authentication enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.10.0.0
Apply vendor-supplied patches for affected Codesys products; restrict network access to control system interfaces to authenticated, authorized personnel only; implement network segmentation to limit exposure.
4.10.0.0 or later
- Identify the specific Codesys Control product (Beaglebone, Empc A/imx6, Iot2000, Linux, Pfc100, Pfc200, Plcnext, or Raspberry Pi) currently installed
- Upgrade the Codesys Control software to version 4.10.0.0 or later
- After upgrading, verify the CmpApp component is running correctly and the service is operational
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-37546 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-37546 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data