CVE-2023-37937
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') in Fortinet FortiSwitch version 7.4.0 and 7.2.0 through 7.2.5 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.7 and 6.4.0 through 6.4.13 and 6.2.0 through 6.2.7 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.7 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via the FortiSwitch CLI.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceFortiSwitch CLI contains an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) allowing authenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary operating system commands on the affected device. The flaw exists in the CLI interface and affects versions 6.0.x through 7.4.x across multiple branch releases.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, < 6.2.8>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.14>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.8>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.6= 7.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check FortiSwitch firmware versionLog into the FortiSwitch CLI and run: `get system status` or `show system firmware`. Look for the version number in the output.Affected if The version shown falls within any of these ranges: 6.0.0 through 6.2.7, 6.4.0 through 6.4.13, 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, 7.2.0 through 7.2.5, or exactly 7.4.0.
-
Verify CLI access method configurationIn FortiSwitch CLI, run: `get system interface` to list network interfaces, then check if management interfaces allow SSH access. Run `show system global` to review global admin access settings.Affected if SSH/Telnet access is enabled on any interface that is reachable from untrusted networks.
-
Review admin user accounts and access restrictionsRun `get system admin` to list admin accounts. Check for overly permissive access or unnecessary accounts with administrative privileges.Affected if Multiple admin accounts exist, especially with weak or shared passwords, or without IP access restrictions.
-
Check management access policiesRun `get system management` or review the management access configuration to see which IPs/networks are permitted for CLI access.Affected if Management access is permitted from any IP address (0.0.0.0/0) or from networks outside the trusted management network.
You are affected if your FortiSwitch runs a firmware version matching any of the vulnerable ranges AND the CLI interface is accessible to authenticated users, particularly from untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.2.86.4.147.0.8
Apply Fortinet's patches for this vulnerability - upgrade to the vendor-specified fixed versions. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict CLI access to trusted management networks and enforce strong authentication to limit attack surface.
Upgrade to FortiSwitch 6.2.8 or later (6.0.x branch), 6.4.14 or later (6.4.x branch), 7.0.8 or later (7.0.x branch), 7.2.6 or later (7.2.x branch), or 7.4.1 or later (7.4.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current FortiSwitch firmware version by running: get system status
- 2. Determine which version branch (6.0.x, 6.4.x, 7.0.x, 7.2.x, or 7.4.x) the device is running
- 3. Review the FortiSwitch Upgrade Guide for your model to ensure compatibility: https://docs.fortinet.com/upgrade/
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed version firmware from Fortinet Customer Support: https://support.fortinet.com/
- 5. Upload the firmware to the FortiSwitch via the management interface or SCP
- 6. Execute the firmware upgrade with the command: execute firmware upgrade <image_file>
- 7. After reboot, verify the new version is installed and the vulnerability is resolved: get system status
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-37937 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-37937 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data