CVE-2023-3794
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Bug Finder ChainCity Real Estate Investment Platform 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /chaincity/user/ticket/create of the component New Ticket Handler. The manipulation of the argument subject leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. VDB-235062 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the ChainCity Real Estate Investment Platform 1.0. The 'subject' parameter in the ticket creation form at /chaincity/user/ticket/create lacks proper input sanitization, allowing attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that executes when other users view the created ticket.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm ChainCity platform installationLocate the web application's installation directory and identify the exact version of the ChainCity Real Estate Investment Platform. Check version files, README, or application metadata for version number 1.0.Affected if The installed version is ChainCity Real Estate Investment Platform 1.0.
-
Verify ticket creation endpoint existsAccess the URL path /chaincity/user/ticket/create in the web browser or via an HTTP request tool. Confirm the ticket creation form is accessible and includes a 'subject' input field.Affected if The ticket creation form at /chaincity/user/ticket/create is accessible and contains a subject parameter field.
-
Check input sanitization on subject fieldReview the server-side code handling the ticket creation form, specifically the code processing the 'subject' parameter. Look for input validation, sanitization, or output encoding functions applied before storing the subject value.Affected if The subject parameter lacks server-side input validation or sanitization (no sanitization library, regex filter, or encoding function is applied).
-
Test for stored XSS in subject fieldSubmit a test ticket with a benign XSS payload in the subject field (such as <script>alert(1)</script> or <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>). Save the ticket and then view it as a different user to see if the script executes.Affected if The submitted JavaScript payload executes when viewing the ticket, indicating the stored XSS vulnerability is present.
A user is affected if the ChainCity Real Estate Investment Platform version 1.0 is installed, the ticket creation form at /chaincity/user/ticket/create is accessible, and the subject parameter lacks proper server-side input sanitization allowing stored JavaScript to execute when tickets are viewed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement server-side input validation and output encoding for the subject field and all user-supplied data. Use established sanitization libraries (e.g., DOMPurify, OWASP Java Encoder) to neutralize script tags and XSS vectors before storing and displaying user input.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3794 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3794 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data