CVE-2023-38007
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.5.0, 2.3.3.7, 2.3.3.7 iFix1 on Power and 2.3.3.6, 2.3.3.6 iFix1, 2.3.3.6 iFix2, 2.3.4.0, 2.3.4.1 on Intel operating systems is vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM Cloud Pak System versions 2.3.3.6 through 2.3.5.0 contain an HTML injection vulnerability where unsanitized user-supplied input is rendered in web pages without proper encoding. An unauthenticated remote attacker can embed malicious HTML/JavaScript into affected fields, which executes in the victim's browser within the security context of the hosting site, potentially leading to session hijacking or credential theft.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.3.3.6= 2.3.3.7= 2.3.4.0= 2.3.4.1= 2.3.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify IBM Cloud Pak System versionLocate the installed version of IBM Cloud Pak System in the system documentation, administration console, or by running the platform version command provided by IBM (typically via `cpctl version` or through the Cloud Pak console).Affected if The installed version is 2.3.3.6, 2.3.3.7, 2.3.4.0, 2.3.4.1, or 2.3.5.0.
-
Confirm version is within affected rangeCompare your installed version against the affected range: versions 2.3.3.6 through 2.3.5.0 (inclusive).Affected if Your version falls within 2.3.3.6 to 2.3.5.0.
-
Identify accessible web interfacesLocate any web-based login or user input fields in the IBM Cloud Pak System administration console or user portals that accept user-supplied data.Affected if Web interfaces are exposed and accept user input without confirmation that output encoding is applied.
-
Review user input handlingExamine the application's response when submitting HTML or script tags in web form fields (login forms, search fields, profile fields). Observe whether the input is reflected back in the response without sanitization.Affected if User-supplied input is rendered in web pages without proper HTML encoding.
You are affected if IBM Cloud Pak System version 2.3.3.6 through 2.3.5.0 is installed and web interfaces render unsanitized user input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply IBM Cloud Pak System security patches for version 2.3.3.7+ (Power) and 2.3.4.2+ (Intel), or upgrade to a patched release. Additionally, implement input validation and output encoding on all user-facing fields to prevent HTML injection.
IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.5.0 or later (contact IBM for exact fixed release)
- 1. Back up all critical data and configurations before initiating the upgrade
- 2. Review IBM Cloud Pak System upgrade documentation for your current version
- 3. Plan maintenance window as upgrade may require downtime
- 4. Upgrade IBM Cloud Pak System to version 2.3.5.0 or later fixed release
- 5. After upgrade, verify the HTML injection vulnerability is resolved by testing input validation in affected web interfaces
- 6. Monitor IBM Cloud Pak System for any post-upgrade issues
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-38007 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-38007 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data