CVE-2023-38119
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFoxit PDF Reader AcroForm signature Out-Of-Bounds Read Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of signature fields. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-21326.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOut-of-bounds read vulnerability in Foxit PDF Reader's AcroForm signature field handling due to lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, allowing read past end of allocated buffer and potential remote code execution in current process context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 10.1.12.37872>= 11.0.0, <= 11.2.6.53790>= 12.0.0, <= 12.1.2.15332<= 12.1.2.15332CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Foxit productOpen Foxit PDF Reader or Editor, go to Help > About, or check Programs and Features in Windows Control Panel for the installed version numberAffected if The installed version is Foxit Pdf Reader <= 12.1.2.15332, or Foxit Pdf Editor in ranges <= 10.1.12.37872, >= 11.0.0 and <= 11.2.6.53790, or >= 12.0.0 and <= 12.1.2.15332
-
Confirm product typeVerify whether the installed product is Foxit PDF Reader or Foxit PDF Editor, as both have different affected version rangesAffected if Product is Foxit PDF Reader in any version up to and including 12.1.2.15332
-
Determine if AcroForm signatures are processedOpen a PDF document in the Foxit application, then check if the document contains AcroForm signature fields by viewing the form fields or signature propertiesAffected if A PDF with AcroForm signature fields is opened in a vulnerable version of Foxit, triggering the out-of-bounds read during signature field parsing
A user is affected if they have Foxit PDF Reader version 12.1.2.15332 or earlier, or Foxit PDF Editor in one of the specified vulnerable version ranges, and open a PDF containing malicious AcroForm signature field data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Foxit PDF Reader to latest patched version; avoid opening untrusted or unknown PDF files; disable JavaScript execution in Foxit Reader as a defense-in-depth measure.
Foxit PDF Reader 12.1.3 or later / Foxit PDF Editor 10.1.13 or later / Foxit PDF Editor 11.2.7 or later / Foxit PDF Editor 12.1.3 or later
- 1. Identify the currently installed Foxit product (PDF Reader or PDF Editor) and note the exact version number from the application's Help > About menu
- 2. Download the latest version of the affected product from the official Foxit website at www.foxit.com
- 3. Close any running instances of Foxit PDF Reader or PDF Editor
- 4. Run the installer for the latest downloaded version and follow the prompts to complete the upgrade
- 5. Verify the installation was successful by checking Help > About to confirm the new version number
- 6. Re-open any previously used PDF documents to ensure functionality is intact
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,456.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-38119 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-38119 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data