ModsecurityApplication · Owasp

CVE-2023-38285

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-07-26
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.0.10 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Trustwave ModSecurity 3.x before 3.0.10 has Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

ModSecurity 3.x before version 3.0.10 contains an inefficient algorithmic complexity vulnerability. This computational complexity issue could allow attackers to cause denial of service by triggering excessive resource consumption through specially crafted requests that exploit the inefficient algorithm.

MitigationUpgrade ModSecurity to version 3.0.10 or later to remediate the inefficient algorithmic complexity vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ModsecurityApplication
Affected:>= 3.0.0, < 3.0.10

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify ModSecurity version
    Run `modsecurity --version` or check the ModSecurity log file for the version string at startup. On Linux systems, you can also use `rpm -qa | grep mod_security` or `dpkg -l | grep modsecurity` depending on your package manager.
    Affected if The version displayed is 3.0.0 through 3.0.9 (any version >= 3.0.0 but < 3.0.10)
  2. Locate ModSecurity installation directory
    Check common installation paths such as `/usr/local/modsecurity/`, `/etc/modsecurity/`, or the directory containing your modsecurity.conf file. The location depends on your deployment method (source compile or package manager).
    Affected if A ModSecurity installation exists in a path consistent with versions 3.0.0 through 3.0.9
  3. Verify the running ModSecurity library version
    If ModSecurity is deployed as an Apache, Nginx, or IIS module, identify the running library by examining the process list or loading the module and checking its reported version. Use `httpd -v` for Apache or check the error logs for ModSecurity version information.
    Affected if The loaded ModSecurity library reports a version between 3.0.0 and 3.0.9

If ModSecurity 3.x is installed and its version is 3.0.0 through 3.0.9, the environment is affected by this inefficient algorithmic complexity vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.0.10 or later
Fixed in 3.0.10
Interim mitigation

Upgrade ModSecurity to version 3.0.10 or later to remediate the inefficient algorithmic complexity vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

ModSecurity 3.0.10

  1. 1. Check current ModSecurity version using 'modsecurity -v' or checking your package manager
  2. 2. Download ModSecurity 3.0.10 from the official GitHub repository or your distribution's package repository
  3. 3. Stop any services using ModSecurity (e.g., Apache, Nginx) before upgrading
  4. 4. Install ModSecurity 3.0.10 using your system's package manager or compile from source
  5. 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number
  6. 6. Restart the web server (Apache/Nginx) to load the updated ModSecurity library
  7. 7. Test that the web server and ModSecurity are functioning correctly with your existing rules
Caveat Minor: Review any custom rules or configurations to ensure compatibility with the 3.0.10 release, though this is primarily a bugfix release

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Modsecurity Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,440
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-38285 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-38285 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data