ShadowmakerApplication · Minitool

CVE-2023-38354

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-09-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
MiniTool Shadow Maker version 4.1 contains an insecure installation process that allows attackers to achieve remote code execution through a man in the middle attack.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

MiniTool Shadow Maker v4.1 has an insecure installation process that downloads components over unencrypted channels without proper integrity verification, allowing a man-in-the-middle attacker to inject malicious code during installation and achieve remote code execution.

MitigationAvoid using version 4.1; download and verify the latest version from official sources; perform installations only on trusted networks; verify installer checksums if provided by the vendor.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ShadowmakerApplication
Affected:= 4.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify MiniTool Shadow Maker installation
    Check if MiniTool Shadow Maker is installed on the system. Look in Program Files or Program Files (x86) for a 'MiniTool ShadowMaker' folder, or check the Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for an entry named 'MiniTool ShadowMaker'
    Affected if The software is installed and the version shows 4.1
  2. Confirm installed version number
    Locate the installed executable (typically ShadowMaker.exe in the installation directory) and check its file version property, or look for version information in the registry uninstall entry
    Affected if The version displayed is exactly 4.1
  3. Inspect installation directory for unexpected files
    Open the MiniTool Shadow Maker installation folder and list all files. Look for recently added or unexpected DLLs, EXEs, or scripts that were not part of a clean installation, especially files with suspicious names or sizes
    Affected if There are unknown DLLs or executables in the installation directory that were not part of a standard installation
  4. Check for evidence of untrusted network installation
    Review any available installation logs, temporary download folders (such as %TEMP% or %USERPROFILE%\Downloads), or network capture data that might indicate whether components were downloaded over HTTP rather than HTTPS
    Affected if Installation was performed over an unencrypted or untrusted network connection, or downloaded installers were obtained from non-official sources

A user is affected if MiniTool Shadow Maker version 4.1 is installed, particularly if the initial installation occurred over an unencrypted or untrusted network connection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Avoid using version 4.1; download and verify the latest version from official sources; perform installations only on trusted networks; verify installer checksums if provided by the vendor.

Fix this in Shadowmaker Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
4.0 hours of engineering $750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-38354 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-38354 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data