CVE-2023-38366
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Filenet Content Manager Component 5.5.8.0, 5.5.10.0, and 5.5.11.0 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to view arbitrary files on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 261115.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Filenet Content Manager versions 5.5.8.0, 5.5.10.0, and 5.5.11.0 contain a path traversal vulnerability allowing remote attackers to view arbitrary files on the system by sending specially crafted URL requests containing dot-dot sequences (/../). The vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation on URL path parameters.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.5.8= 5.5.10= 5.5.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IBM Filenet Content Manager versionCheck the version through the administration console, or look for version info in the installation directory in files like version.properties, about.html, or the administration WAR file manifestAffected if The installed version is 5.5.8, 5.5.10, or 5.5.11
-
Confirm the web application is accessibleVerify the IBM Filenet Content Manager web interface is running and accessible on the network. Attempt to reach the application URL (typically / Workplace or /NeckWeb endpoints)Affected if The web interface is running and exposed
-
Check for URL parameter handlingReview web server or proxy logs for incoming requests containing path traversal sequences like /../ in the URL path. Also inspect any existing WAF or intrusion detection logsAffected if Requests with ../ sequences are being processed without rejection or are logged as blocked
-
Verify input validation configurationExamine the web application configuration files (such as web.xml or IBM HTTP Server configuration) for any URL filtering or input validation rules related to path parametersAffected if No path traversal protection is configured or defined rules are absent
A user is affected if IBM Filenet Content Manager version 5.5.8, 5.5.10, or 5.5.11 is installed and the web interface is accessible, allowing potential exploitation of the path traversal via specially crafted URLs containing /../ sequences.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-provided patches or upgrades to a fixed version. Implement input validation and canonicalization on all file path parameters to reject sequences containing ../ and ensure paths resolve within intended directories.
IBM Filenet Content Manager 5.5.12 or later (or latest available cumulative patch/ifid for your version)
- 1. Check IBM Fix Central (fixcentral.ibm.com) for IBM Filenet Content Manager security patches
- 2. Search for CVE-2023-38366 or APAR numbers related to this vulnerability
- 3. Download and apply the appropriate interim fix (iFID) or cumulative patch for your current version (5.5.8, 5.5.10, or 5.5.11)
- 4. Alternatively, upgrade to IBM Filenet Content Manager 5.5.12 or later which contains the security fix
- 5. After applying the fix, test the directory traversal protection by verifying that URLs with /../ sequences are rejected
- 6. Restart the affected IBM Content Platform Engine services as required by the patch
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-38366 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-38366 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data