Security Access ManagerApplication · Ibm

CVE-2023-38368

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-06-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 10.0.7.1 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Security Access Manager Docker 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.7.1 could disclose sensitive information to a local user to do improper permission controls. IBM X-Force ID: 261195.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Security Access Manager Docker versions 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.7.1 contains improper permission controls that allow a local user to access sensitive information. The vulnerability requires local access and low privileges, with high confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability impact.

MitigationApply any available IBM security patches for this version range. If no patch exists, review and restrict file system permissions within the Docker container to ensure proper access controls prevent unauthorized local users from reading sensitive data.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Security Access ManagerApplication
Affected:>= 10.0.0.0, <= 10.0.7.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed IBM Security Access Manager Docker version
    Run 'docker images' or inspect the container metadata to find the image tag/version. Alternatively, inside the container, check for version files or run 'docker inspect <container_id>' to view version labels.
    Affected if The version is 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.7.1 inclusive.
  2. Verify the environment is a Docker container
    Confirm the application is running inside a Docker container by checking for /.dockerenv file, container runtime files in /proc/1/cgroup, or using 'docker inspect' on the running container.
    Affected if The application is running as a Docker container (this vulnerability affects Docker deployments specifically).
  3. Inspect file system permissions on configuration directories
    Inside the container, use 'ls -la' to examine permissions on common sensitive directories such as /opt, /var, /config, or any directory containing IBM ISAM configuration files. Look for permissions that allow world-readable or group-readable access.
    Affected if Configuration or data directories are readable by low-privilege or unauthorized users (permissions like 755, 644, or group-readable without justification).
  4. Check for world-readable sensitive files
    Search for files containing credentials, keys, or sensitive data using commands like 'find / -perm -004 -type f 2>/dev/null' or specifically check files in /opt/ibm, /var/opt, or config paths. Verify if sensitive files have overly permissive access modes.
    Affected if Sensitive files (config files with passwords, keystores, private keys) have permissions allowing access by any local user (world-readable).
  5. Verify user isolation within the container
    Check which user the container is running as using 'whoami' or 'id' inside the container. Review if the container runs as root or a privileged user versus an unprivileged ISAM-specific user.
    Affected if The container runs as root or allows low-privilege users to access files they should not have permission to read.

The environment is affected if IBM Security Access Manager Docker version 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.7.1 is installed AND the container file system permissions allow unauthorized local users to read sensitive configuration or data files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 10.0.7.1
Interim mitigation

Apply any available IBM security patches for this version range. If no patch exists, review and restrict file system permissions within the Docker container to ensure proper access controls prevent unauthorized local users from reading sensitive data.

Fix this in Security Access Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-38368 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-38368 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data