CVE-2023-38399
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Averta Phlox Portfolio allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Phlox Portfolio: from n/a through 2.3.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePath traversal vulnerability in Averta Phlox Portfolio plugin (versions through 2.3.1) allows attackers to manipulate file paths in PHP include statements, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution through local file inclusion or reading sensitive system files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Phlox Portfolio plugin is installedLocate the plugin in wp-content/plugins/ directory or check via WordPress admin plugins listAffected if Plugin folder named 'phlox-portfolio' or similar variant exists on the server
-
Identify installed plugin versionCheck plugin header in main PHP file (usually phlox-portfolio.php) or read version from WordPress plugin API / readme.txtAffected if Version number is 2.3.1 or lower (any version through 2.3.1)
-
Locate vulnerable include/require codeSearch plugin PHP files for include/require statements using variable parameters (e.g., include($_GET['file'], include($path, etc.)Affected if Any PHP file in the plugin contains dynamic includes using unsanitized user input
-
Check for unauthorized filesInspect wp-content/uploads/ and plugin directory for unfamiliar .php files, webshells, or recently modified scriptsAffected if Unknown PHP files exist or timestamps show recent unauthorized modifications
Your environment is affected if the Averta Phlox Portfolio plugin version is 2.3.1 or lower AND the plugin files contain dynamic include/require statements that accept user-controlled path parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to the latest patched version of Phlox Portfolio; if no patch exists, disable the plugin. Implement strict input validation using basename() and realpath() to sanitize file path inputs before use in include/require statements.
Phlox Portfolio 2.3.2 or later (verify exact fixed version from vendor)
- Check the WordPress theme repository or Averta's official website for the latest version of Phlox Portfolio
- Verify that version 2.3.2 or later is available and includes the security fix for CVE-2023-38399
- Backup your WordPress site before performing any updates
- Update Phlox Portfolio to the latest version through WordPress admin or by downloading from the official source
- Verify the update was successful and test the site functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-38399 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-38399 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data