CVE-2023-38711
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Libreswan before 4.12. When an IKEv1 Quick Mode connection configured with ID_IPV4_ADDR or ID_IPV6_ADDR receives an IDcr payload with ID_FQDN, a NULL pointer dereference causes a crash and restart of the pluto daemon. NOTE: the earliest affected version is 4.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLibreswan before version 4.12 contains a NULL pointer dereference in the pluto IKE daemon. When an IKEv1 Quick Mode connection is configured to expect an IPv4 or IPv6 address ID (ID_IPV4_ADDR/ID_IPV6_ADDR) but receives an IDcr payload containing an ID_FQDN (Fully Qualified Domain Name), the daemon attempts to process the FQDN as an IP address, resulting in a NULL dereference crash and restart of the pluto daemon.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.6, < 4.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Libreswan versionRun 'ipsec --version' or 'rpm -q libreswan' (RHEL) or 'dpkg -l libreswan' (Debian) to retrieve the installed version numberAffected if The installed version is 4.6 or higher but lower than 4.12
-
Verify IKEv1 Quick Mode connections existReview /etc/ipsec.conf and files in /etc/ipsec.d/ for 'phase2=esp' or 'phase2alg' configurations, which indicate IKEv1 Quick Mode. Also check for 'ikev1=...' directivesAffected if Any IKEv1 Quick Mode (phase2) connections are configured using Libreswan
-
Identify connections expecting IPv4/IPv6 address IDsSearch configuration files for 'leftid=ip' or 'rightid=ip' directives, or look for connections using ID_IPV4_ADDR/ID_IPV6_ADDR ID types. These indicate the connection expects an IP address IDAffected if Any IKEv1 Quick Mode connection is configured to expect an IPv4 or IPv6 address ID (ID_IPV4_ADDR/ID_IPV6_ADDR)
-
Confirm pluto daemon is running and reachableRun 'ipsec status' or check if the pluto process is running via 'ps aux | grep pluto'Affected if The pluto daemon is active and processing IKE connections
A user is affected if Libreswan version is between 4.6 and 4.11 inclusive AND they have IKEv1 Quick Mode connections configured to expect IPv4/IPv6 address IDs, with the pluto daemon actively running.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.12
Upgrade to Libreswan 4.12 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict IKEv1 Quick Mode peer connections to trusted sources to prevent malicious ID type mismatches from triggering the crash.
Libreswan 4.12 or later
- Check current installed Libreswan version using 'ipsec --version' or package manager
- Backup current configuration files in /etc/ipsec.d/ and /etc/ipsec.conf
- Download Libreswan 4.12 or later from the official source (downloads.libreswan.org or GitHub releases)
- Extract the source package if downloading source code
- For source installations: Run './configure && make && make install' as root or via sudo
- For package manager systems: Install the downloaded package using your distro's package manager (e.g., 'dpkg -i' or 'rpm -U')
- Verify the new version is installed using 'ipsec --version'
- Restart the ipsec service using 'systemctl restart ipsec' or 'service ipsec restart'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-38711 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-38711 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data