LibreswanApplication

CVE-2023-38712

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-08-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.0 / 4.12 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in Libreswan 3.x and 4.x before 4.12. When an IKEv1 ISAKMP SA Informational Exchange packet contains a Delete/Notify payload followed by further Notifies that act on the ISAKMP SA, such as a duplicated Delete/Notify message, a NULL pointer dereference on the deleted state causes the pluto daemon to crash and restart.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Libreswan pluto daemon contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in IKEv1 ISAKMP SA Informational Exchange handling. When a Delete/Notify payload is followed by additional Notifies targeting the same ISAKMP SA (such as a duplicated Delete/Notify), the daemon attempts to dereference a pointer to already-deleted state information, causing the pluto daemon to crash and restart.

MitigationUpgrade to Libreswan version 4.12 or later to resolve this vulnerability. For systems that cannot immediately upgrade, consider restricting IKEv1 traffic at network boundaries as a compensating control.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
LibreswanApplication
Affected:>= 3.0, < 4.0>= 4.0, < 4.12

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Libreswan version
    Run 'ipsec --version' or check package manager (rpm -q libreswan, dpkg -l libreswan)
    Affected if Version is >= 3.0 and < 4.0, OR >= 4.0 and < 4.12
  2. Verify IKEv1 connections are in use
    Run 'ipsec status' or check /etc/ipsec.conf for 'keyexchange=ikev1' directives and active IKEv1 Security Associations
    Affected if IKEv1 connections are active or configured; the vulnerability only triggers with IKEv1 ISAKMP SA traffic
  3. Inspect pluto daemon for recent crashes
    Check system logs (journalctl -u ipsec, /var/log/daemon.log, /var/log/messages) for pluto restarts or segfaults related to Delete/Notify payload handling
    Affected if Pluto daemon has recently crashed and restarted with IKEv1 traffic present
  4. Check for Notify payload patterns in IKEv1 traffic
    Monitor or review IKEv1 traffic logs for Delete/Notify messages targeting existing ISAKMP SAs, especially duplicate Notify sequences
    Affected if IKEv1 Delete/Notify traffic with repeated Notifies to the same SA is observed

You are affected if running a vulnerable Libreswan version (< 4.12, >= 3.0) AND IKEv1 connections are active, with potential daemon crashes observed in logs.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.0 / 4.12 or later
Fixed in 4.04.12
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Libreswan version 4.12 or later to resolve this vulnerability. For systems that cannot immediately upgrade, consider restricting IKEv1 traffic at network boundaries as a compensating control.

Recommended fix High confidence

Libreswan 4.12

  1. Upgrade Libreswan to version 4.12 or later
  2. Verify the upgrade completed successfully by checking the installed version (e.g., ipsec --version)
  3. Restart the pluto daemon to ensure the new version is running (systemctl restart ipsec or equivalent)
  4. Monitor the system logs for any unexpected crashes following the upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Libreswan Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,900
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-38712 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-38712 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data