CVE-2023-38713
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.3.0, 2.3.3.3, 2.3.3.3 iFix1, 2.3.3.4, 2.3.3.5, 2.3.3.6, 2.3.3.6 iFix1, 2.3.3.6 iFix2, 2.3.3.7, and 2.3.3.7 iFix1 could disclose sensitive information about the system that could aid in further attacks against the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInformation disclosure vulnerability in IBM Cloud Pak System allows unauthorized access to sensitive system information that could aid in further attacks. The specific nature of the disclosed information is not detailed in available documentation, but the CVSS 7.5 score indicates significant impact from the exposure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.3.0.0= 2.3.3.0= 2.3.3.3= 2.3.3.4= 2.3.3.5= 2.3.3.6= 2.3.3.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the IBM Cloud Pak System versionAccess the IBM Cloud Pak System management console or use the 'cloudctl' CLI tool with command: cloudctl version. Alternatively, check the product version through the IBM Cloud Pak System Sibling UI under System > Software > InstancesAffected if The version displayed is 2.3.0.0 through 2.3.3.7 (inclusive)
-
Confirm version matches affected releaseCompare the identified version number against the known affected versions: 2.3.0.0, 2.3.3.0, 2.3.3.3, 2.3.3.4, 2.3.3.5, 2.3.3.6, or 2.3.3.7Affected if The installed version exactly matches any of these versions or falls within this range
-
Verify system is accessible over networkTest network connectivity to the IBM Cloud Pak System management interfaces. Check if ports 443, 8443, or other management ports are exposed externally using tools like nmap or netcatAffected if The management interfaces are reachable from untrusted networks, increasing exposure to potential information disclosure
-
Review access logs for anomalous information requestsExamine IBM Cloud Pak System audit logs and access logs for unexpected or unauthorized queries that may indicate exploitation of information disclosureAffected if Logs show unauthorized access attempts or unusual data retrieval patterns targeting system information
If the installed IBM Cloud Pak System version is 2.3.0.0 through 2.3.3.7 and the management interfaces are network-accessible, the environment is likely affected by this information disclosure vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply IBM-provided patches or ifixes for this vulnerability. Upgrade to a version beyond 2.3.3.7 iFix1, or implement compensating controls such as network segmentation and access restrictions to limit exposure of sensitive system data.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-38713 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-38713 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data