CVE-2023-38908
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in TPLink Smart Bulb Tapo series L530 before 1.2.4, L510E before 1.1.0, L630 before 1.0.4, P100 before 1.5.0, and Tapo Application 2.8.14 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the TSKEP authentication function.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn information disclosure vulnerability in TP-Link Tapo smart home devices (L530, L510E, L630, P100) and the Tapo mobile application allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information through the TSKEP authentication function. The vulnerability affects specific firmware versions before the fixes and can be exploited without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.8.14= 1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Tapo mobile application version on iOSOpen the App Store, go to the Tapo app page, and view the version number under the app nameAffected if The installed version is earlier than 2.8.14
-
Check Tapo mobile application version on AndroidOpen Google Play Store, go to the Tapo app listing, and view the version number under the app nameAffected if The installed version is earlier than 2.8.14
-
Check Tapo L530e smart bulb firmware versionOpen the Tapo mobile app, select the L530e device, go to Device Settings, then Device Info, and note the Firmware VersionAffected if The firmware version is earlier than 1.2.4
-
Check Tapo L510E smart bulb firmware versionOpen the Tapo mobile app, select the L510E device, go to Device Settings, then Device Info, and note the Firmware VersionAffected if The firmware version is earlier than 1.1.0
-
Check Tapo L630 smart bulb firmware versionOpen the Tapo mobile app, select the L630 device, go to Device Settings, then Device Info, and note the Firmware VersionAffected if The firmware version is earlier than 1.0.4
-
Check Tapo P100 smart plug firmware versionOpen the Tapo mobile app, select the P100 device, go to Device Settings, then Device Info, and note the Firmware VersionAffected if The firmware version is earlier than 1.5.0
The environment is affected if any Tapo mobile app version is earlier than 2.8.14, or if any of the specific device models (L530e, L510E, L630, P100) have firmware versions earlier than their respective fixed versions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate all affected TP-Link Tapo devices to the latest firmware versions (L530 1.2.4, L510E 1.1.0, L630 1.0.4, P100 1.5.0) and update the Tapo mobile application to version 2.8.14 or later.
Tapo L530: firmware >= 1.2.4 | Tapo L510E: firmware >= 1.1.0 | Tapo L630: firmware >= 1.0.4 | Tapo P100: firmware >= 1.5.0 | Tapo Application: version > 2.8.14
- Identify the specific Tapo device model (L530, L510E, L630, P100) or Tapo Application version in use
- For Tapo L530e: Upgrade firmware to version 1.2.4 or later
- For Tapo L510E: Upgrade firmware to version 1.1.0 or later
- For Tapo L630: Upgrade firmware to version 1.0.4 or later
- For Tapo P100: Upgrade firmware to version 1.5.0 or later
- For Tapo Application: Upgrade to a version newer than 2.8.14
- Verify the upgrade was successful and the TSKEP authentication vulnerability is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-38908 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-38908 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data