Wg302v2 FirmwareOperating system · Netgear

CVE-2023-38921

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-08-07
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Netgear WG302v2 v5.2.9 and WAG302v2 v5.1.19 were discovered to contain multiple command injection vulnerabilities in the upgrade_handler function via the firmwareRestore and firmwareServerip parameters.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Command injection vulnerability in Netgear WG302v2 and WAG302v2 wireless access points. The upgrade_handler function fails to sanitize the firmwareRestore and firmwareServerip parameters, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands via crafted HTTP requests.

MitigationSince these are legacy/end-of-life devices unlikely to receive vendor patches, replace with supported hardware. If immediate replacement isn't feasible, restrict management interface access to trusted networks only using firewall rules and disable WAN management access.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Wg302v2 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 5.2.9
Wag302v2 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 5.1.19

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Access the device web management interface and check the device information or status page, or inspect the physical device label for model number WG302v2 or WAG302v2
    Affected if The device is a Netgear WG302v2 or WAG302v2 wireless access point
  2. Determine the firmware version
    In the web interface, navigate to Maintenance > Firmware Upgrade or Help > About to view the current firmware version. Note the exact version number displayed
    Affected if The firmware version is exactly 5.2.9 for WG302v2 or exactly 5.1.19 for WAG302v2
  3. Assess web management interface exposure
    Review network firewall rules and device configuration to determine if the HTTP/HTTPS management interface is accessible from outside trusted management networks. Check for any port forwarding rules or WAN access settings
    Affected if The web management interface is exposed to untrusted or public network segments
  4. Examine device logs for indicators
    Access the device logging or diagnostics section. Review logs for unusual entries, especially around firmware upgrade functionality or unexpected system commands
    Affected if Logs contain suspicious HTTP requests to upgrade functions or unexpected command execution attempts

The environment is affected if a Netgear WG302v2 or WAG302v2 device is running the specific vulnerable firmware (5.2.9 or 5.1.19) and has its management interface accessible to untrusted networks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Since these are legacy/end-of-life devices unlikely to receive vendor patches, replace with supported hardware. If immediate replacement isn't feasible, restrict management interface access to trusted networks only using firewall rules and disable WAN management access.

Fix this in Wg302v2 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
36.0 hours of engineering $6,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-38921 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-38921 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data