Bioaccess IvsApplication · Zkteco

CVE-2023-38958

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-08-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An access control issue in ZKTeco BioAccess IVS v3.3.1 allows unauthenticated attackers to arbitrarily close and open the doors managed by the platform remotely via sending a crafted web request.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

ZKTeco BioAccess IVS v3.3.1 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to open and close managed doors by sending crafted HTTP requests. The access control failure enables complete unauthorized control of physical access points without any credentials.

MitigationApply vendor security patches immediately if available; until patched, restrict network exposure using firewalls/VPNs and implement WAF rules to detect and block anomalous door control requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Bioaccess IvsApplication
Affected:= 3.3.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the BioAccess IVS installation version
    Locate the installed version through the product's web interface (typically in System > About or System > License), administrative console, or by checking the software inventory/registry entries where the application stores its version information
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 3.3.1, matching the vulnerable release
  2. Confirm the HTTP management interface is accessible
    Attempt to access the BioAccess IVS web portal via browser or HTTP client on the configured port (commonly 8080 or 8443 for this product line)
    Affected if The web interface is reachable and responds, indicating the attack surface is active
  3. Verify door control endpoint exposure
    Send a crafted HTTP request to typical door control endpoints (such as /door/open, /door/close, or API paths controlling relay outputs) without providing any authentication credentials
    Affected if The door control endpoints respond with success or execute the requested action without requiring authentication, confirming the bypass exists
  4. Assess network accessibility of the management interface
    Determine if the BioAccess IVS HTTP service is bound to any IP address other than localhost, or is reachable from network segments beyond the trusted internal network
    Affected if The interface is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet, increasing exploitation likelihood

A user is affected if BioAccess IVS version 3.3.1 is installed AND the HTTP door control endpoints accept and execute commands without any authentication credentials.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor security patches immediately if available; until patched, restrict network exposure using firewalls/VPNs and implement WAF rules to detect and block anomalous door control requests.

Fix this in Bioaccess Ivs Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,280
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-38958 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-38958 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data