CVE-2023-3898
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in mAyaNet E-Commerce Software allows SQL Injection. This issue affects E-Commerce Software: before 1.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL Injection vulnerability in mAyaNet E-Commerce Software allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user input, potentially enabling unauthorized data access, modification, or deletion of database contents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Mayanets E Commerce is installedSearch the system for Mayanets E Commerce software components, check for installed application directories, or review web server logs/vhost configurations for this applicationAffected if The software is present on the system
-
Identify the installed versionLocate version information through the application itself (typically in an About page, version file, or footer), configuration files, or installation metadataAffected if The exact version number cannot be determined or is not documented
-
Compare version to affected rangeReview the identified version against the affected range: versions < 1.1 are vulnerableAffected if The installed version is lower than 1.1 (e.g., 1.0, 0.9, or any version below 1.1)
-
Verify database interaction points existExamine the application for features that accept user input and interact with the database (search fields, login forms, product filters, user registration, or any parameter that could be passed to a database query)Affected if The application processes user input through database queries and the version is < 1.1
A system is affected if Mayanets E Commerce version < 1.1 is installed and the application processes user-supplied input through database queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.1
Upgrade to version 1.1 or later. As immediate defense-in-depth, implement parameterized queries/prepared statements and input validation across all database interactions.
Version 1.1
- Upgrade mAyaNet E-Commerce Software to version 1.1 or later to resolve the SQL injection vulnerability.
- After upgrading, verify that the application functions correctly and test that the SQL injection vulnerability is no longer exploitable.
- If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the application and implement Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block SQL injection attempts.
- Consult the vendor's official release notes or security advisory for any additional required post-upgrade configuration.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3898 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3898 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data