CVE-2023-3899
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in subscription-manager that allows local privilege escalation due to inadequate authorization. The D-Bus interface com.redhat.RHSM1 exposes a significant number of methods to all users that could change the state of the registration. By using the com.redhat.RHSM1.Config.SetAll() method, a low-privileged local user could tamper with the state of the registration, by unregistering the system or by changing the current entitlements. This flaw allows an attacker to set arbitrary configuration directives for /etc/rhsm/rhsm.conf, which can be abused to cause a local privilege escalation to an unconfined root.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe subscription-manager D-Bus interface (com.redhat.RHSM1) exposes the Config.SetAll() method to all local users without proper authorization, allowing any user to write arbitrary configuration to /etc/rhsm/rhsm.conf. By manipulating configuration directives, an attacker can escalate privileges to unconfined root.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.28.39>= 1.29.0, < 1.29.37= 37= 38= 8.0= 9.0= 7.0= 8.6= 8.8= 9.0= 9.2= 8.0= 9.0= 9.2= 8.6= 8.8= 9.0= 9.2= 7.0= 8.0= 9.0= 9.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify subscription-manager is installedRun: rpm -qa | grep -i subscription-managerAffected if The package is not installed, the system is not affected by this specific vulnerability.
-
Check installed subscription-manager versionRun: rpm -q --queryformat '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}' subscription-manager 2>/dev/null or check /usr/bin/subscription-manager --versionAffected if Version falls within < 1.28.39 or >= 1.29.0 and < 1.29.37, indicating the system is potentially affected.
-
Verify D-Bus service is activeRun: systemctl status rhsm.service 2>/dev/null || systemctl list-units --type=service | grep -i rhsmAffected if The D-Bus service is not running or does not exist, the attack surface is not present.
-
Check if D-Bus interface is exposed to unprivileged usersRun: busctl introspect com.redhat.RHSM1 /com/redhat/RHSM1/Config 2>/dev/null || dbus-send --system --dest=com.redhat.RHSM1 --print-reply /com/redhat/RHSM1/Config org.freedesktop.DBus.Introspectable.IntrospectAffected if Config.SetAll method is visible and accessible without authentication, the system is vulnerable.
-
Verify configuration file permissionsCheck: ls -la /etc/rhsm/rhsm.confAffected if The file is world-writable or owned by an unprivileged user, exploitation is possible.
A system is affected if subscription-manager version is below 1.28.39 or between 1.29.0 and 1.29.37, and the D-Bus RHSM1 interface is accessible to unprivileged users allowing them to call Config.SetAll.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.28.391.29.37
Restrict access to the com.redhat.RHSM1 D-Bus interface by implementing appropriate D-Bus policy files to limit method calls to privileged users, or update subscription-manager to a version that includes proper authorization checks.
subscription-manager >= 1.28.39 (for 1.28.x branch) or subscription-manager >= 1.29.37 (for 1.29.x branch)
- Verify the current subscription-manager version by running: rpm -q subscription-manager
- For RHEL systems, update the package using: sudo dnf update subscription-manager or sudo yum update subscription-manager
- For Fedora systems, update using: sudo dnf update subscription-manager
- After update, verify the new version is >= 1.28.39 or >= 1.29.37 using: rpm -q subscription-manager
- Reboot may be required for the updated D-Bus service to take effect
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3899 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3899 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data