CVE-2023-39268
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA memory corruption vulnerability in ArubaOS-Switch could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by receiving specially crafted packets. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMemory corruption vulnerability in ArubaOS-Switch allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges by sending specially crafted network packets to the affected device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< a.15.16.0026>= 16.01.0000, < 16.04.0027>= 16.05.0000, < 16.08.0027>= 16.10.0001, < 16.10.0024>= 16.11.0001, < 16.11.0013CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine the installed ArubaOS-Switch versionAccess the switch CLI and run the command 'show version' to display the firmware version. Alternatively, access the web management interface and navigate to the System or About section to view the software version.Affected if The displayed version falls into any of these vulnerable ranges: < a.15.16.0026; >= 16.01.0000 and < 16.04.0027; >= 16.05.0000 and < 16.08.0027; >= 16.10.0001 and < 16.10.0024; >= 16.11.0001 and < 16.11.0013
-
Identify the full version string preciselyRecord the complete version number from the 'show version' output, including any prefix letters. ArubaOS versions may appear as 'a.15.x.x', '16.01.x.x', '16.05.x.x', '16.10.x.x', or '16.11.x.x' format.Affected if The version number matches the pattern of any affected branch and is lower than the corresponding patched version (16.04.0027, 16.08.0027, 16.10.0024, or 16.11.0013)
-
Verify network accessibility of the switch management interfaceConfirm whether the switch management IP address is reachable from network segments that are not strictly controlled. Check if protocols like telnet, SSH, or web management are enabled and accessible from untrusted networks.Affected if The device is network-accessible without additional authentication layers beyond the switch login, as the vulnerability allows unauthenticated remote code execution via crafted network packets
You are affected if your ArubaOS-Switch version falls within any of the listed vulnerable ranges and the device management interface is accessible from your network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped16.04.002716.08.002716.10.0024
Apply the Aruba security patch immediately; until patched, restrict network access to management interfaces and disable unused protocols to reduce attack surface.
Upgrade to a.15.16.0026 (15.x) or 16.04.0027 (16.01.x) or 16.08.0027 (16.05-16.07.x) or 16.10.0024 (16.10.x)
- 1. Identify the currently installed ArubaOS-Switch version by running 'show version' or 'show flash' on the switch CLI.
- 2. Determine which version branch your current firmware belongs to (15.x, 16.01.x, 16.05-16.07.x, or 16.10.x).
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed firmware version from the Aruba support portal: For 15.x branch, upgrade to a.15.16.0026 or later; For 16.01.x branch, upgrade to 16.04.0027 or later; For 16.05-16.07.x branch, upgrade to 16.08.0027 or later; For 16.10.x branch, upgrade to 16.10.0024 or later.
- 4. Transfer the firmware file to the switch using TFTP, FTP, or USB (e.g., 'copy tftp://<server>/<file> flash').
- 5. Verify the firmware image integrity if prompted.
- 6. Execute the firmware upgrade command (e.g., 'boot system <flash filename>' or use the 'write memory' after reload command).
- 7. Reload the switch when maintenance window permits.
- 8. After reboot, verify the new version is running with 'show version' and confirm the vulnerability is remediated.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-39268 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-39268 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data