CVE-2023-39276
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSonicOS post-authentication stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the getBookmarkList.json URL endpoint leads to a firewall crash.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in SonicOS firewall firmware in the getBookmarkList.json endpoint. The flaw is post-authentication, requiring valid credentials to exploit, and can cause the firewall to crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.0.1-5145< 6.5.4.4-44v-21-2340< 6.5.4.13-105nCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed SonicOS firmware versionAccess the firewall management interface and navigate to System > Status or use the 'show version' command via CLI (SSH or console). Note the exact firmware version string displayed.Affected if The installed version is lower than 7.0.1-5145, or lower than 6.5.4.4-44v-21-2340, or lower than 6.5.4.13-105n (depending on your major release branch)
-
Identify the major Sonicos release branchExamine the firmware version string: versions starting with 7.x indicate the 7.0.x branch, versions starting with 6.5.4.x indicate the 6.5.4.x branch. Determine which branch your firewall is running.Affected if You are running any 6.5.4.x version below 6.5.4.13-105n or below 6.5.4.4-44v-21-2340, or any 7.0.x version below 7.0.1-5145
-
Verify management interface accessibilityDetermine if the SonicWall management interface (HTTPS on port 443 or HTTP on port 80) is reachable from untrusted networks. Check firewall access rules and NAT policies.Affected if The management interface is exposed to networks outside your trusted internal network (since the vulnerability is post-authentication but can crash the firewall)
You are affected if your installed SonicOS version is below 7.0.1-5145 (for 7.0.x releases), below 6.5.4.4-44v-21-2340 (for 6.5.4.0-3.x releases), or below 6.5.4.13-105n (for 6.5.4.4+ releases), and the management interface is accessible to potential attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.4.4-44v-21-23406.5.4.13-105n7.0.1-5145
Apply the vendor-supplied SonicOS firmware update to patch the vulnerability. Until patched, limit access to the management interface to trusted networks only.
Sonicos 7.0.1-5145 (or later 7.x); Sonicos 6.5.4.4-44v-21-2340 (or later 6.5.4.4); Sonicos 6.5.4.13-105n (or later 6.5.4.13)
- 1. Identify the current Sonicos version running on the affected SonicWall firewall
- 2. Determine which version branch is in use (7.x, 6.5.4.4, or 6.5.4.13)
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed release from the SonicWall support portal: 7.0.1-5145 or higher for 7.x branch; 6.5.4.4-44v-21-2340 or higher for 6.5.4.4 branch; 6.5.4.13-105n or higher for 6.5.4.13 branch
- 4. Back up the current firewall configuration
- 5. Upload and install the firmware upgrade via the SonicWall management interface
- 6. After upgrade, verify the firewall is operational and the vulnerability is resolved
- 7. Confirm the new firmware version matches or exceeds the fixed releases
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-39276 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-39276 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data