CVE-2023-39278
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSonicOS post-authentication user assertion failure leads to Stack-Based Buffer Overflow vulnerability via main.cgi leads to a firewall crash.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA post-authentication stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in SonicOS main.cgi interface. The vulnerability stems from a user assertion failure that allows an authenticated attacker to trigger a stack buffer overflow, resulting in firewall crash (denial of service).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.0.1-5145< 6.5.4.4-44v-21-2340< 6.5.4.13-105nCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device and confirm SonicOS is runningAccess the device management interface or use SNMP/CLI commands (such as 'show version' or 'get system status') to confirm the device is a SonicWall appliance running SonicOS firmware.Affected if The device is not a SonicWall appliance or does not run SonicOS.
-
Retrieve the installed SonicOS versionLog into the SonicWall administrative interface (web GUI or CLI) and navigate to System > Status or use the 'show version' command in CLI to obtain the exact firmware version string.Affected if Unable to retrieve a version number from the device.
-
Compare version against affected ranges for SonicOS 7.xCheck if the retrieved version is below 7.0.1-5145. If the version string starts with 7.0, extract the full version number and compare numerically to 7.0.1-5145.Affected if The installed version is 7.0.x and is lower than 7.0.1-5145.
-
Compare version against affected ranges for SonicOS 6.5.4.4Check if the retrieved version is below 6.5.4.4-44v-21-2340. If the version string starts with 6.5.4.4, extract the build number and compare to 44v-21-2340.Affected if The installed version is 6.5.4.4-x and is lower than 6.5.4.4-44v-21-2340.
-
Compare version against affected ranges for SonicOS 6.5.4.13Check if the retrieved version is below 6.5.4.13-105n. If the version string starts with 6.5.4.13, extract the build number and compare to 105n.Affected if The installed version is 6.5.4.13-x and is lower than 6.5.4.13-105n.
The device is affected if it is a SonicWall appliance running SonicOS with a version lower than 7.0.1-5145, lower than 6.5.4.4-44v-21-2340, or lower than 6.5.4.13-105n.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.4.4-44v-21-23406.5.4.13-105n7.0.1-5145
Apply the vendor-supplied patch from SonicWall for affected SonicOS versions. Restrict administrative management interface access to trusted networks or VPN to reduce attack surface.
SonicOS 7.0.1-5145 (or later); 6.5.4.4-44v-21-2340 (or later); 6.5.4.13-105n (or later)
- 1. Identify the current SonicOS version running on the firewall device
- 2. Determine which version branch the device is running (7.0.x, 6.5.4.4-x, or 6.5.4.13-x)
- 3. For devices on 7.0.x branch: Upgrade to version 7.0.1-5145 or later
- 4. For devices on 6.5.4.4-x branch: Upgrade to version 44v-21-2340 or later
- 5. For devices on 6.5.4.13-x branch: Upgrade to version 105n or later
- 6. Download the firmware from the official SonicWall support portal (mysonicwall.com)
- 7. Upload and apply the firmware upgrade through the SonicWall management interface
- 8. After upgrade, verify the device is functioning properly and the vulnerability is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-39278 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-39278 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data