Mivoice ConnectApplication · Mitel

CVE-2023-39289

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-08-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 9.6.2208.101 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the Connect Mobility Router component of Mitel MiVoice Connect through 9.6.2208.101 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct an account enumeration attack due to improper configuration. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to access system information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is an account enumeration vulnerability in Mitel MiVoice Connect's Connect Mobility Router. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit improper configuration to determine valid user accounts by observing different system responses, potentially gaining system information that could aid further attacks.

MitigationConfigure the Connect Mobility Router to return uniform responses for both valid and invalid account queries, implement rate limiting on authentication endpoints, and apply vendor-recommended hardening configurations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mivoice ConnectApplication
Affected:<= 9.6.2208.101

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify MiVoice Connect installation
    Locate Mitel MiVoice Connect installation directories or check installed programs on the server. Common paths include C:\Mitel\Connect or /opt/mitel/connect. Use system inventory tools or check Program Files directory on Windows.
    Affected if MiVoice Connect is installed and the version is 9.6.2208.101 or lower
  2. Verify Connect Mobility Router component
    Confirm the Connect Mobility Router (CMR) component is present and enabled. Check for CMR service or configuration files in the MiVoice Connect installation directory.
    Affected if Connect Mobility Router is installed and running as part of MiVoice Connect
  3. Check CMR accessibility
    Determine if the Connect Mobility Router web interface or API endpoints are exposed externally. Review firewall rules, reverse proxy configurations, and network ACLs that control access to CMR ports (typically ports 443, 8443, or 48080).
    Affected if CMR is accessible from untrusted networks without authentication restrictions
  4. Test account enumeration response behavior
    Send HTTP requests to CMR login endpoints with both valid and invalid username formats. Compare HTTP status codes, response times, and error messages for differences. Common endpoints include /mobility/login or /api/auth.
    Affected if The system returns measurably different responses (status codes, error messages, or response times) for valid versus invalid account inputs
  5. Review authentication configuration
    Examine CMR configuration files for settings related to error messaging, account lockout, and response standardization. Look for XML or config files in the CMR configuration directory.
    Affected if Configuration allows distinct error messages for valid vs invalid usernames or lacks uniform response handling

The environment is affected if MiVoice Connect version 9.6.2208.101 or lower is installed with Connect Mobility Router enabled and accessible, and the system returns differentiated responses that could enable account enumeration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 9.6.2208.101
Interim mitigation

Configure the Connect Mobility Router to return uniform responses for both valid and invalid account queries, implement rate limiting on authentication endpoints, and apply vendor-recommended hardening configurations.

Fix this in Mivoice Connect Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-39289 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-39289 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data