CVE-2023-39294
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn OS command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow authenticated administrators to execute commands via a network. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.1.3.2578 build 20231110 and later QuTS hero h5.1.3.2578 build 20231110 and later
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in QNAP QTS and QuTS hero operating systems that allows authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary commands via network. The vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation allowing command injection through the web interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.1.0.2348= 5.1.0.2399= 5.1.0.2418= 5.1.0.2444= 5.1.0.2466= 5.1.1.2491= 5.1.2.2533= h5.1.0.2409= h5.1.0.2424= h5.1.0.2453= h5.1.0.2466= h5.1.1.2488= h5.1.2.2534CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify QNAP device operating system and versionLog into the QNAP device via SSH or the web interface. In the web UI, go to Control Panel > System > Firmware. Alternatively, run the command 'getconf' or check /etc/config/defalut/filelist for version information.Affected if The device runs QTS or QuTS hero and the version matches one of the affected builds: 5.1.0.2348, 5.1.0.2399, 5.1.0.2418, 5.1.0.2444, 5.1.0.2466, 5.1.1.2491, 5.1.2.2533 for QTS or h5.1.0.2409, h5.1.0.2424, h5.1.0.2453, h5.1.0.2466, h5.1.1.2488, h5.1.2.2534 for QuTS hero.
-
Confirm the web interface is accessibleVerify that the QNAP web administration console (port 8080 or 443) is reachable from the network. Check firewall rules and device network configuration.Affected if The web interface is exposed to untrusted networks, increasing exploitability.
-
Verify administrator account existenceCheck for existing admin-level accounts in Control Panel > Privilege > Users > User List, or via the command 'admin' user presence in /etc/passwd.Affected if At least one administrator account exists on the device, which is required for exploitation.
-
Check if QTS or QuTS hero is runningRun 'uname -a' via SSH or check the system information page in the web UI to confirm the exact OS variant and build number.Affected if The device is running QTS or QuTS hero with a version matching the affected build list.
A device is affected if it runs QTS or QuTS hero with any of the listed build versions AND has the web interface accessible with at least one administrator account configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate QNAP devices to QTS 5.1.3.2578 build 20231110 or later / QuTS hero h5.1.3.2578 build 20231110 or later. Restrict administrative access to trusted networks and implement least-privilege administrator accounts.
QTS 5.1.3.2578 build 20231110 or later / QuTS hero h5.1.3.2578 build 20231110 or later
- 1. Back up all critical data and configurations on the QNAP device before proceeding with the upgrade
- 2. Verify current QTS or QuTS hero version by accessing the QNAP admin interface
- 3. For QTS: Upgrade to version 5.1.3.2578 build 20231110 or later
- 4. For QuTS hero: Upgrade to version h5.1.3.2578 build 20231110 or later
- 5. Access the QNAP admin dashboard and navigate to Control Panel > System > Firmware Update
- 6. Click 'Check for Update' to download and install the latest available fixed version
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new firmware version in the admin interface
- 8. After upgrade, verify the command injection vulnerability is resolved by confirming the patch is applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-39294 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-39294 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data