CVE-2023-39298
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA missing authorization vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow local authenticated users to access data or perform actions that they should not be allowed to perform via unspecified vectors. QuTScloud, is not affected. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.0.2737 build 20240417 and later QuTS hero h5.2.0.2782 build 20240601 and later
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a missing authorization (broken access control) vulnerability in QNAP QTS and QuTS hero operating systems that allows authenticated local users to access data or perform actions beyond their intended permissions through unspecified vectors.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.1.0.2348= 5.1.0.2399= 5.1.0.2418= 5.1.0.2444= 5.1.0.2466= 5.1.1.2491= 5.1.2.2533= 5.1.3.2578= 5.1.4.2596= 5.1.5.2645= 5.1.5.2679= 5.1.6.2722= h5.1.0.2409= h5.1.0.2424= h5.1.0.2453= h5.1.0.2466= h5.1.1.2488= h5.1.2.2534= h5.1.3.2578= h5.1.4.2596= h5.1.5.2647= h5.1.5.2680= h5.1.6.2734= h5.1.7.2770CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the QNAP operating system productCheck the system information or about page in QTS/QuTS hero admin interface to determine if the system is running QTS, QuTS hero, or QuTScloudAffected if System is running QTS or QuTS hero (QuTScloud is unaffected)
-
Check QTS firmware versionIn QTS admin interface, go to Control Panel > System > Firmware Update > Check firmware version, or use the command `getsysinfo` via SSHAffected if Version matches any of: 5.1.0.2348, 5.1.0.2399, 5.1.0.2418, 5.1.0.2444, 5.1.0.2466, 5.1.1.2491, 5.1.2.2533, 5.1.3.2578, 5.1.4.2596, 5.1.5.2645, 5.1.5.2679, 5.1.6.2722
-
Check QuTS hero firmware versionIn QuTS hero admin interface, go to Control Panel > System > Firmware Update > Check firmware version, or use the command `getsysinfo` via SSHAffected if Version matches any of: h5.1.0.2409, h5.1.0.2424, h5.1.0.2453, h5.1.0.2466, h5.1.1.2488, h5.1.2.2534, h5.1.3.2578, h5.1.4.2596, h5.1.5.2647, h5.1.5.2680, h5.1.6.2734, h5.1.7.2770
The environment is affected if running QTS or QuTS hero and the installed version matches one of the listed vulnerable versions; QuTScloud is not affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to QTS 5.2.0.2737 build 20240417 or later, or QuTS hero h5.2.0.2782 build 20240601 or later. QuTScloud is unaffected.
QTS 5.2.0.2737 (build 20240417) or QuTS hero h5.2.0.2782 (build 20240601) depending on product
- 1. Identify the current QNAP OS version by accessing the QNAP admin console and checking System Settings > About
- 2. If running QTS, verify the current version is one of the affected versions (5.1.0.2348, 5.1.0.2399, 5.1.0.2418, or 5.1.0.2444)
- 3. If running QuTS hero, verify the current version is one of the affected versions (h5.1.0.2409, h5.1.0.2424, h5.1.0.2453, or h5.1.0.2466)
- 4. For QTS systems: Update to QTS version 5.2.0.2737 build 20240417 or later via the QNAP Control Panel > System > Firmware Update
- 5. For QuTS hero systems: Update to QuTS hero version h5.2.0.2782 build 20240601 or later via the QNAP Control Panel > System > Firmware Update
- 6. After updating, verify the new version matches or exceeds the fixed versions listed
- 7. Confirm the vulnerability is resolved by verifying the system operates normally post-update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-39298 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-39298 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data