CVE-2023-39337
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security vulnerability in EPMM Versions 11.10, 11.9 and 11.8 older allows a threat actor with knowledge of an enrolled device identifier to access and extract sensitive information, including device and environment configuration details, as well as secrets. This vulnerability poses a serious security risk, potentially exposing confidential data and system integrity.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an information disclosure vulnerability in EPMM where the system fails to properly validate authorization when a request includes a valid enrolled device identifier. An attacker with knowledge of a device identifier can bypass authentication controls to access device configuration details and secrets stored in the system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 11.9.0>= 11.10.0, < 11.10.0.4>= 11.11.0, < 11.11.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed EPMM versionAccess the EPMM administration console or check the system information page to locate the exact version number of the installationAffected if The version falls within <= 11.9.0, >= 11.10.0 but < 11.10.0.4, or >= 11.11.0 but < 11.11.0.2
-
Verify if device enrollment is activeCheck the EPMM console or database for the presence of enrolled mobile devices. This can be done through the admin interface under device management or by querying the device enrollment statusAffected if There are enrolled devices in the system and the version is affected, making the vulnerability potentially exploitable
-
Review access logs for device identifier patternsExamine EPMM server logs for requests that include device identifiers (device IDs, UDIDs, or similar identifiers) without proper session credentials or authentication tokensAffected if Logs show requests accessing device configuration endpoints using only a device identifier without corresponding authentication session validation
-
Inspect API endpoint responsesTest API endpoints that return device configuration data by supplying a known valid device identifier in the request. Observe whether the system returns sensitive configuration details or secrets without requiring full authenticationAffected if The system returns device configuration details, secrets, or sensitive data when queried with just a valid device identifier without a valid authenticated session
A user is affected if their EPMM version is within the affected ranges AND the system has enrolled devices, allowing unauthorized access to device configuration data via device identifier injection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped11.10.0.411.11.0.2
Implement proper authorization validation to ensure requests with device identifiers are also subject to full authentication and session verification before granting access to sensitive configuration data and secrets.
Upgrade to EPMM 11.10.0.4, 11.11.0.2, or later
- 1. Identify the current EPMM version by accessing the admin console or checking system information
- 2. If running version <= 11.9.0, upgrade to version 11.11.0.2 or later
- 3. If running version 11.10.0 through 11.10.0.3, upgrade to version 11.10.0.4 or later
- 4. If running version 11.11.0 through 11.11.0.1, upgrade to version 11.11.0.2 or later
- 5. After upgrading, verify the patch was applied successfully and review system logs for any suspicious activity
- 6. Consider rotating any secrets that may have been exposed, as recommended by Ivanti security advisories
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-39337 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-39337 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data