CVE-2023-3944
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in phpscriptpoint Lawyer 1.6 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file page.php. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-235400. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the page.php file of phpscriptpoint Lawyer 1.6. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to inject malicious JavaScript code through unspecified user inputs, which gets executed in victims' browsers when viewing the affected page.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed productLocate and inspect the website or application to confirm it is running the Phpscriptpoint Lawyer script. Check for banners, footers, or admin panels identifying the software.Affected if The application is not Phpscriptpoint Lawyer or the product name differs.
-
Confirm the software versionCheck the installed version of Phpscriptpoint Lawyer. Inspect admin panels, README files, version metadata in source code, or consult the vendor documentation for version identification methods.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.6 (no other versions are affected per the provided advisory).
-
Locate the page.php fileSearch the web root directory for a file named page.php. Common paths may include the root directory or a subdirectory related to pages or content. Review the file contents to confirm it handles page rendering.Affected if The page.php file does not exist in the expected locations.
-
Identify user input points in page.phpReview page.php source code to locate all instances where user-supplied data is received, such as through $_GET, $_POST, or $_REQUEST superglobals. Note the specific parameters being used.Affected if There are no user input parameters in page.php (unlikely but would indicate no exposure).
-
Verify lack of input sanitizationInspect the page.php code around each user input point to determine if the values are passed through any sanitization functions (such as htmlspecialchars, strip_tags, or similar) before being output. Check if output encoding is applied before displaying user data.Affected if User input is directly output without sanitization or encoding, allowing script injection.
-
Test for XSS executionIf you have a test environment, inject a benign XSS payload (such as <script>alert('test')</script>) into the identified user input parameters within page.php and observe whether the script executes in the browser.Affected if The payload executes as JavaScript in the browser, confirming the XSS vulnerability is present.
You are affected if you are running Phpscriptpoint Lawyer version 1.6 and the page.php file contains user input parameters that are not sanitized before output.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement robust input validation and output encoding/sanitization on all user-supplied data in page.php. Until a vendor patch is available, consider deploying a WAF rule to filter XSS payloads or disabling the affected functionality.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3944 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3944 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data