CVE-2023-39470
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPaperCut NG print.script.sandboxed Exposed Dangerous Function Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of PaperCut NG. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the management of the print.script.sandboxed setting. The issue results from the exposure of a dangerous function. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-20965.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePaperCut NG contains a vulnerability in its print.script.sandboxed setting management that exposes a dangerous function, allowing authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. This is a remote code execution vulnerability requiring valid authentication credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 22.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify PaperCut NG versionAccess the admin interface and navigate to the About or System Information page to view the installed version number, or check the version from the installation metadataAffected if The installed version is lower than 22.1.1
-
Locate print.script.sandboxed settingAccess the admin configuration panel and search for the print.script.sandboxed parameter in the print settings or scripting configuration sectionAffected if The print.script.sandboxed setting exists and is enabled or configurable
-
Verify admin interface accessibilityConfirm the PaperCut NG admin web interface is exposed and accessible, noting whether it requires strong authenticationAffected if The admin interface is accessible over the network without adequate access controls
-
Check for custom script configurationsReview any custom print scripts or scripting configurations stored in the PaperCut data directory that may leverage the sandboxed settingAffected if Custom scripts are present in the print.script.sandboxed context
You are affected if running PaperCut NG version below 22.1.1 with the print.script.sandboxed feature accessible to authenticated users via the admin interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped22.1.1
Apply vendor patches for CVE-2023-39470, review and restrict the print.script.sandboxed configuration if not required, and enforce strong authentication controls for administrative interfaces.
PaperCut NG 22.1.1 or later
- Verify current PaperCut NG version by accessing the management interface or checking the product about page
- Backup the PaperCut NG configuration and database before upgrading
- Download PaperCut NG version 22.1.1 or later from the official PaperCut website (www.papercut.com)
- Stop the PaperCut NG service before performing the upgrade
- Run the installer for the new version, following the on-screen prompts
- After installation, start the PaperCut NG service
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version in the management interface
- Review the print.script.sandboxed setting in the management console to ensure it is properly configured for security
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-39470 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-39470 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data