CVE-2023-39989
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 99robots Header Footer Code Manager plugin <= 1.1.34 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the 99robots Header Footer Code Manager WordPress plugin versions 1.1.34 and earlier allows attackers to trick authenticated administrators into performing unintended actions (such as injecting malicious code into headers/footers) by leveraging the lack of proper nonce validation on sensitive plugin actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.1.34CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm plugin installation and versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Header Footer Code Manager' (by 99robots or Draftpress). Note the version number displayed. Alternatively, inspect the plugin's main PHP file header in wp-content/plugins/Affected if The version is 1.1.34 or lower
-
Identify vulnerable plugin file pathsLocate the plugin directory (typically wp-content/plugins/header-footer-code-manager or similar). Look for PHP files handling admin form submissions, particularly files with names like admin.php, class-hfcm-admin.php, or files containing 'update', 'save', 'add', or 'delete' action handlersAffected if The plugin directory exists and contains PHP files handling header/footer code injection actions
-
Check for missing nonce validation in action handlersOpen the plugin's PHP files that process admin actions. Search for sensitive functions (like adding/updating/deleting header or footer code snippets). Look for the presence of 'wp_verify_nonce' or 'check_admin_referer' calls BEFORE any database write operations or sensitive functionality. Also check for 'nonce' in form generation (wp_nonce_field)Affected if Form handling files lack proper nonce verification calls before processing header/footer code changes, or forms generating the code snippets do not include nonce fields
-
Verify exposed sensitive actionsIn the plugin files, identify all admin action hooks (like 'admin_init', 'wp_ajax_*', or custom action parameters in GET/POST requests). Check if any of these allow modification of header/footer code without requiring authentication confirmation or nonce validationAffected if The plugin processes header/footer code injection requests through admin action hooks without validating a nonce token first
You are affected if the Header Footer Code Manager plugin is installed at version 1.1.34 or earlier AND the plugin's admin action handlers or form submissions lack proper wp_verify_nonce or check_admin_referer validation before processing header/footer code changes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the plugin to a version newer than 1.1.34 which includes proper anti-CSRF nonce validation; if no update is available, implement nonce verification on all plugin form submissions and admin action handlers.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,848.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-39989 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-39989 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data