CVE-2023-40355
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Axigen versions 10.3.3.0 before 10.3.3.59, 10.4.0 before 10.4.19, and 10.5.0 before 10.5.5, allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code and obtain sensitive information via the logic for switching between the Standard and Ajax versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Axigen mail server's web interface version switching logic between Standard and Ajax modes. Authenticated attackers can inject malicious scripts through this mechanism to execute arbitrary code in user sessions and obtain sensitive information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.3.3.0, < 10.3.3.59>= 10.4.0, < 10.4.19>= 10.5.0, < 10.5.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Axigen is installedLook for Axigen processes running on the system (e.g., using task manager, ps, or netstat to check for listening ports typically used by Axigen: 80, 443, 7000, 7070). Check for Axigen installation directories.Affected if Axigen mail server is running and accessible on the system
-
Identify the installed Axigen versionAccess the admin interface or run the version check command provided by Axigen (such as 'axigen --version' or check the About section in the admin panel). Look for version files in the installation directory.Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or is not visible
-
Confirm Mobile Webmail component is enabledCheck the Axigen webmail configuration settings. Access the admin interface and navigate to the webmail settings or Mobile Webmail configuration to verify if this component is active.Affected if Mobile Webmail is enabled and accessible to users
-
Compare version against affected rangesMatch your installed version to these vulnerable ranges: 10.3.3.0 through 10.3.3.58; 10.4.0 through 10.4.18; 10.5.0 through 10.5.4. Any version within these ranges is affected.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: >= 10.3.3.0 and < 10.3.3.59, or >= 10.4.0 and < 10.4.19, or >= 10.5.0 and < 10.5.5
You are affected if Axigen Mobile Webmail is running and its version falls within the vulnerable ranges: 10.3.3.0-10.3.3.58, 10.4.0-10.4.18, or 10.5.0-10.5.4.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.3.3.5910.4.1910.5.5
Update Axigen to version 10.3.3.59, 10.4.19, or 10.5.5 or later to apply the security patch. Limit administrative interface access to trusted users only until the patch can be deployed.
Upgrade to 10.3.3.59 (or later 10.3.x), 10.4.19 (or later 10.4.x), or 10.5.5 (or later 10.5.x) depending on your current branch
- 1. Identify the currently installed Axigen Mobile Webmail version by checking the administration interface or running: axigen --version
- 2. Determine which version branch (10.3.x, 10.4.x, or 10.5.x) the current installation is on
- 3. For 10.3.x branch users: Upgrade to version 10.3.3.59 or later
- 4. For 10.4.x branch users: Upgrade to version 10.4.19 or later
- 5. For 10.5.x branch users: Upgrade to version 10.5.5 or later
- 6. Download the appropriate upgrade package from the official Axigen website (www.axigen.com)
- 7. Back up the current configuration and data before upgrading
- 8. Run the upgrade installer following Axigen's standard upgrade procedure
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-40355 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-40355 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data