CVE-2023-40416
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 17.1 and iPadOS 17.1, macOS Monterey 12.7.1, iOS 16.7.2 and iPadOS 16.7.2, macOS Ventura 13.6.1, macOS Sonoma 14.1. Processing an image may result in disclosure of process memory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA memory handling vulnerability in image processing on Apple devices (iOS, iPadOS, macOS) allows disclosure of process memory. The flaw appears to be an information leak during image parsing, likely a buffer over-read or similar memory access issue that exposes adjacent memory contents when processing specially crafted images.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 16.7.2>= 17.0, < 17.1< 16.7.2>= 17.0, < 17.1>= 12.0.0, < 12.7.1>= 13.0, < 13.6.1>= 14.0, < 14.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device type and OSOn iOS/iPadOS: go to Settings > General > About to see the version. On macOS: click Apple menu > About This Mac to see the version number and name (Monterey, Ventura, or Sonoma).Affected if The device is running iOS, iPadOS, or macOS and processes images - the vulnerability is in the native image parsing system.
-
Check iOS or iPadOS versionNavigate to Settings > General > About on the device and note the version number (e.g., 17.0.3, 16.7.1).Affected if The version is less than 16.7.2, or is 17.0 through 17.0.x (any version from 17.0 up to but not including 17.1).
-
Check macOS versionClick the Apple menu > About This Mac. Note the version number (like 12.6.9, 13.5.2, 14.0.1) and the marketing name (Monterey, Ventura, Sonoma).Affected if The version is 12.x (Monterey) before 12.7.1, 13.x (Ventura) before 13.6.1, or 14.x (Sonoma) before 14.1.
-
Confirm image processing contextThis vulnerability triggers when the device processes image files. Any app that loads images (including Safari, Mail, Photos, messaging apps, or third-party apps) can trigger the vulnerable code path when opening specially crafted image files.Affected if The device processes image files from untrusted sources - no special feature needs to be enabled; the flaw exists in the core image parsing subsystem (ImageIO/CoreGraphics).
The device is affected if it runs iOS/iPadOS versions 16.7.1 or earlier, 17.0.x through 17.0.x, or macOS versions 12.0.0-12.7.0, 13.0-13.6.0, or 14.0-14.0.x, and processes images from untrusted sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped12.7.113.6.114.1
Update affected devices to iOS 17.1/iPadOS 17.1, iOS 16.7.2/iPadOS 16.7.2, macOS Monterey 12.7.1, Ventura 13.6.1, or Sonoma 14.1 or later to apply the memory handling fixes.
Upgrade to iOS 16.7.2 or iOS 17.1; iPadOS 16.7.2 or iPadOS 17.1; macOS 12.7.1, 13.6.1, or 14.1 depending on current major version
- For iOS devices: Go to Settings > General > Software Update and upgrade to iOS 16.7.2 (if currently on 16.x) or iOS 17.1 (if currently on 17.0)
- For iPadOS devices: Go to Settings > General > Software Update and upgrade to iPadOS 16.7.2 (if currently on 16.x) or iPadOS 17.1 (if currently on 17.0)
- For macOS Monterey (12.x) devices: Open System Settings > General > Software Update and upgrade to macOS 12.7.1
- For macOS Ventura (13.x) devices: Open System Settings > General > Software Update and upgrade to macOS 13.6.1
- For macOS Sonoma (14.x) devices: Open System Settings > General > Software Update and upgrade to macOS 14.1
- After updating, verify the version in Settings > General > About (iOS/iPadOS) or System Settings > General > About (macOS)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-40416 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-40416 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data