CVE-2023-40646
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Messaging, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis vulnerability in the Messaging component involves a missing permission check that allows local information disclosure without requiring additional execution privileges. An attacker with local device access could potentially access messaging data they should not have permission to view. The issue likely stems from an unprotected content provider or activity that exposes sensitive messaging information without verifying user permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.0= 12.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Android versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Android version. Confirm the installed Android version is 11.0 or 12.0.Affected if Android version is exactly 11.0 or 12.0, matching the affected version range.
-
Identify installed messaging applicationsCheck Settings > Apps > Messaging or Messages to see all messaging-related apps installed on the device. Note any third-party or default messaging apps.Affected if Any messaging application is installed on an affected Android version (11.0 or 12.0).
-
Check messaging app content providers for exported statusUse a tool like APK Tool or install the app and examine its AndroidManifest.xml. Look for <provider> elements with android:exported="true" that handle messaging data (e.g., SMS, MMS).Affected if A messaging content provider is exported without requiring strong permission checks (e.g., no signature or privileged permission).
-
Inspect messaging activities for permission enforcementExamine the AndroidManifest.xml for <activity> elements related to messaging. Check if they have android:permission attributes set, or if they are exported without protection.Affected if Messaging activities are exported without android:permission or with android:exported="true" and no permission attribute.
-
Review content provider permissions in manifestIn the messaging app's manifest, locate the <provider> definitions and check the android:readPermission and android:writePermission attributes. Determine if they are set to standard system permissions like READ_SMS or are missing/unprotected.Affected if Content providers handling messaging data lack android:readPermission or android:writePermission, or use weak permissions.
A user is affected if their device runs Android 11.0 or 12.0 and has any messaging application with unprotected exported components (content providers or activities) that expose sensitive data without proper permission checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper permission checks (e.g., enforce READ_SMS, READ_MESSAGES, or custom permission verification) before exposing any messaging data through content providers, activities, or services. Apply the principle of least privilege to all data access paths.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-40646 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-40646 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data