CVE-2023-40729
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in QMS Automotive (All versions < V12.39). The affected application lacks security control to prevent unencrypted communication without HTTPS. An attacker who managed to gain machine-in-the-middle position could manipulate, or steal confidential information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceQMS Automotive versions prior to V12.39 lack security controls to enforce HTTPS encryption, allowing unencrypted HTTP communications. An attacker with man-in-the-middle position could intercept, manipulate, or steal confidential data transmitted between clients and the application server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 12.39CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed QMS Automotive versionAccess the QMS Automotive application or system information panel, typically found in the application's About section, Help menu, or system registry under the Siemens installation directory. Run 'msiexec /x {product-code}' or check the Windows Programs and Features list for the installed version.Affected if The displayed version is below V12.39 (e.g., V12.38, V12.0, V11.x, etc.)
-
Verify HTTPS enforcement in server configurationLocate the QMS Automotive server configuration file (commonly named server.config, web.config, or similar in the installation directory under Config or Settings folder). Inspect the binding, protocol, or security settings to determine if HTTPS is explicitly required.Affected if The configuration shows HTTP is enabled without requiring SSL/TLS, or the security setting is set to allow unencrypted connections
-
Check SSL/TLS certificate bindingRun 'netsh http show sslcert' or check IIS/Apache/Nginx bindings if QMS Automotive runs under a web server. Verify that port 443 (HTTPS) is bound to a valid certificate and enabled.Affected if Port 443 has no SSL certificate binding, or the binding exists but is not linked to the QMS Automotive application
-
Inspect client connection settingsReview client-side configuration files or registry settings on machines running QMS Automotive client. Look for connection strings or URL entries in config files under the client installation directory.Affected if Client configuration contains HTTP URLs (http://) rather than HTTPS URLs (https://), or allows fallback to unencrypted connections
-
Test network communication for encryptionUse a network capture tool (Wireshark, tcpdump) or browser developer tools to observe the actual traffic when the QMS Automotive client connects to the server. Attempt to access the application and inspect the initial connection protocol.Affected if The traffic capture shows cleartext HTTP traffic on port 80, or the server responds with HTTP 301/302 redirects to HTTP instead of enforcing HTTPS
You are affected if your QMS Automotive version is below V12.39 AND HTTP (unencrypted) connections are permitted or not explicitly blocked in your configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped12.39
Upgrade QMS Automotive to version V12.39 or later and ensure proper HTTPS/TLS configuration is enforced for all communications.
V12.39 or later
- Upgrade QMS Automotive to version 12.39 or later to obtain the fix for the cleartext transmission vulnerability
- After upgrading, verify that HTTPS is enforced for all communications within the application
- Review application settings to confirm encryption controls are properly enabled
- Test the implementation to ensure all communication channels now use TLS/HTTPS
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-40729 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-40729 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data