Fundraising ScriptApplication · Phpjabbers

CVE-2023-40762

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-08-28
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
User enumeration is found in PHPJabbers Fundraising Script v1.0. This issue occurs during password recovery, where a difference in messages could allow an attacker to determine if the user is valid or not, enabling a brute force attack with valid users.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

User enumeration vulnerability in PHPJabbers Fundraising Script v1.0 password recovery function allows attackers to distinguish between valid and invalid usernames through differing error messages, facilitating targeted brute force attacks against legitimate user accounts.

MitigationImplement uniform error messaging for password recovery to prevent username enumeration; return the same response whether the username exists or not.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Fundraising ScriptApplication
Affected:= 1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm PHPJabbers Fundraising Script v1.0 installation
    Locate the script installation directory and check version.php or similar version file within the application root or includes folder
    Affected if Version is exactly 1.0 (other versions may not be affected)
  2. Locate the password recovery functionality
    Identify the password recovery or 'forgot password' page within the application, typically found at /index.php?controller=pjForgot or similar route under the public-facing web root
    Affected if The password recovery module is accessible and enabled on the site
  3. Test error response for non-existent username
    Submit a clearly invalid username (e.g., 'nonexistentuser123') in the password recovery form and capture the exact error or status message returned
    Affected if A specific error message is returned indicating the user does not exist
  4. Test error response for existing username
    Submit a username you know to be valid (e.g., an administrator account) in the password recovery form and capture the exact error or status message returned
    Affected if A different or more informative message is returned compared to the invalid username test
  5. Compare error messages for enumeration vulnerability
    Compare the exact wording and content of the responses from steps 3 and 4 - examine whether they reveal different information about username validity
    Affected if The error messages differ in content or specificity, revealing whether the username exists in the system

If the Fundraising Script v1.0 is installed and the password recovery returns different error messages for valid versus invalid usernames, the environment is vulnerable to user enumeration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement uniform error messaging for password recovery to prevent username enumeration; return the same response whether the username exists or not.

Fix this in Fundraising Script Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-40762 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-40762 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data