CVE-2023-4095
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUser enumeration vulnerability in Arconte Áurea 1.5.0.0 version. The exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to obtain a list of registered users in the application, obtaining the necessary information to perform more complex attacks on the platform.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUser enumeration vulnerability in Arconte Áurea 1.5.0.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to discover valid usernames through inconsistent responses from authentication or user-related endpoints (e.g., login, password reset, or registration forms). This information can be used to facilitate brute-force or credential-stuffing attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.5.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Arconte Aurea versionLocate the Arconte Aurea installation and check the version number reported by the application or its documentation. Common locations include the software itself, system information panels, or installation logs.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.5.0.0
-
Map authentication-related endpointsReview the application URL structure and identify endpoints that handle login, password reset, registration, or user profile functions. Common patterns include /login, /register, /password-reset, /forgot-password, or similar paths.Affected if The application has accessible authentication endpoints at version 1.5.0.0
-
Test response consistency for valid vs invalid usernamesSend test requests to authentication endpoints using both a known-valid username and a random-invalid username. Compare the HTTP status codes, error messages, and response times between the two requests.Affected if The responses differ between valid and invalid usernames (for example, one returns 'user not found' while the other returns 'invalid password' or similar)
A user is affected if Arconte Aurea version 1.5.0.0 is installed AND the application returns distinguishable responses that reveal whether a username account exists in the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement uniform error messages for all authentication-related responses regardless of username validity, and apply rate limiting to prevent automated enumeration.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-4095 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-4095 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data