CVE-2023-4106
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMattermost fails to check if the requesting user is a guest before performing different actions to public playbooks, resulting a guest being able to view, join, edit, export and archive public playbooks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an authorization bypass vulnerability where Mattermost fails to validate whether a requesting user is a guest before allowing actions on public playbooks. The missing guest user check allows unauthorized guest accounts to view, join, edit, export, and archive public playbooks that should be restricted.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.8.0, < 7.8.8>= 7.9.0, < 7.9.6>= 7.10.0, < 7.10.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed Mattermost versionAccess the Mattermost System Console and navigate to About > Edition and License, or run the /version command in a channel. Compare the version number against the affected ranges: 7.8.0 through 7.8.7, 7.9.0 through 7.9.5, and 7.10.0 through 7.10.3Affected if The installed version is 7.8.0-7.8.7, 7.9.0-7.9.5, or 7.10.0-7.10.3
-
Confirm guest access is enabledIn the System Console, go to Authentication > Guest Access and verify whether the Enable guest access setting is turned onAffected if Guest access is enabled and the Mattermost version is in the affected range listed above
-
Identify public playbooks in the environmentNavigate to the Playbooks section in the main Mattermost navigation. Review the playbook list and identify any playbooks that are configured as Public (visible to anyone on the team or site)Affected if Public playbooks exist and guest access is enabled on an affected version
-
Verify guest user permissions on public playbooksLog in as a guest user account and attempt to access a public playbook. Test whether you can view, join, edit, export, or archive the playbook. Alternatively, review the playbook membership settings in the Playbooks sectionAffected if A guest user can view, join, edit, export, or archive a public playbook that they should not have access to
Your environment is affected if Mattermost is version 7.8.0-7.8.7, 7.9.0-7.9.5, or 7.10.0-7.10.3 AND guest access is enabled AND public playbooks exist that should not be accessible to guest accounts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.8.87.9.67.10.4
Apply the vendor patch when available; meanwhile, review and restrict guest user permissions to sensitive playbooks or consider disabling guest accounts if not required.
Upgrade to Mattermost 7.10.4 or later (or 7.8.8 if on 7.8.x branch, 7.9.6 if on 7.9.x branch)
- 1. Back up your Mattermost database and configuration files before upgrading.
- 2. Review Mattermost upgrade documentation for your deployment type (e.g., Ansible, Docker, Kubernetes, manual).
- 3. For Mattermost Self-Hosted: Download the latest fixed version (7.10.4 or later) from https://mattermost.com/download/.
- 4. For Docker deployments: Update your image tag to the fixed version (e.g., mattermost/mattermost-team-edition:7.10.4).
- 5. For Kubernetes: Update your deployment manifest with the new image version.
- 6. Restart the Mattermost server to apply the changes.
- 7. Verify the upgrade by logging in and confirming guest users can no longer perform unauthorized actions on public playbooks.
- 8. Test that legitimate functionality (playbook creation, management by proper users) still works correctly.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-4106 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-4106 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data