UserminApplication · Webmin

CVE-2023-41157

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-09-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Usermin 2.000 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the folder name parameter while creating the folder to manage the folder tab, filter tab, and forward mail tab.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Usermin 2.000 contains multiple stored XSS vulnerabilities where remote attackers can inject arbitrary web script or HTML through the folder name parameter when creating folders. The vulnerability affects three separate functions: the folder management tab, filter tab, and forward mail tab. Since this is stored XSS, the malicious payload persists and executes when other users interact with the affected folders.

MitigationImplement proper input validation and output encoding for the folder name parameter across all three affected tabs (folder management, filter, and forward mail). Consider using a whitelist approach for folder names and ensuring all user-supplied data is sanitized before storage and display.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
UserminApplication
Affected:= 2.000

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Usermin installation and version
    Check the installed Usermin version using the package manager (e.g., rpm -q usermin, dpkg -l usermin) or access the Usermin configuration interface and look for the version number in the main page or about section.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.000 (not newer or older versions)
  2. Identify enabled Usermin modules
    Access the Usermin configuration and review which modules are enabled. Specifically check for: 1) Folder management module, 2) Filter module, 3) Forward mail module. These are typically found under the module configuration or user access settings.
    Affected if Any of the three vulnerable modules (folder management, filter, or forward mail) are enabled for users
  3. Review folder configuration access
    Check if regular users have permission to create or manage mail folders through Usermin. This can be verified in the Usermin module access control settings for each user or group.
    Affected if Users have permissions to create or manage folders via the affected interfaces
  4. Inspect existing folder names for malicious content
    Review the mail folder configurations and examine stored folder names in the configuration files or through the folder management interface. Look for any folder names containing script tags, HTML elements, or suspicious encoded content.
    Affected if Any folder names contain script tags, HTML tags, or suspicious JavaScript-like content (e.g., <script, onerror=, javascript:)

You are affected if Usermin version is exactly 2.000 AND at least one of the three vulnerable modules (folder management, filter, or forward mail) is enabled and accessible to users who can create folders.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper input validation and output encoding for the folder name parameter across all three affected tabs (folder management, filter, and forward mail). Consider using a whitelist approach for folder names and ensuring all user-supplied data is sanitized before storage and display.

Fix this in Usermin Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-41157 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-41157 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data