CVE-2023-41611
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVicture PC420 1.1.39 was discovered to use a weak and partially hardcoded key to encrypt data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Victure PC420 device version 1.1.39 implements encryption using a weak and partially hardcoded key. This means an attacker who obtains the firmware or intercepts encrypted communications can potentially recover the key and decrypt sensitive data. The hardcoded portion of the key can be discovered through reverse engineering of the firmware binary.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.1.39CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelLocate the device label, packaging, or check the device's admin interface for the exact model name. Confirm it is a Victure PC420.Affected if The device is not a Victure PC420 - not affected
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the device admin interface or use the manufacturer's app to view firmware version information. The exact version number must be 1.1.39.Affected if Firmware version is not 1.1.39 - not affected
-
Verify firmware version via firmware binaryIf you have access to the firmware file or can extract it from the device, examine the firmware metadata or version string embedded in the binary.Affected if Firmware version cannot be confirmed as 1.1.39 - status unknown
-
Inspect firmware for hardcoded key patternsExtract the firmware binary and search for static strings or byte sequences that resemble encryption keys. Look for hardcoded key material in encryption-related binary sections.Affected if Hardcoded encryption key patterns found in firmware - confirmed affected (this confirms the vulnerability is present)
The environment is affected if the device is a Victure PC420 running firmware version 1.1.39, which contains the weak and partially hardcoded encryption key.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched firmware version if available from Victure. If no patch exists, contact the vendor for remediation guidance and consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the affected device.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-41611 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-41611 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data