CVE-2023-41633
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCatdoc v0.95 was discovered to contain a NULL pointer dereference via the component xls2csv at src/fileutil.c.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCatdoc v0.95 contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in the xls2csv component within src/fileutil.c. When processing specially crafted input files, the application attempts to dereference a NULL pointer, causing a crash and resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.95CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Catdoc installationRun 'which catdoc' or check your system's package manager for the catdoc packageAffected if catdoc is not found on the system - you are not affected
-
Check Catdoc versionRun 'catdoc --version' to display the installed version numberAffected if version displayed is 0.95 - you are affected
-
Verify xls2csv component presenceRun 'which xls2csv' or check for the xls2csv binary in the catdoc installation directoryAffected if xls2csv exists and is executable on the system
You are affected if Catdoc version 0.95 is installed and the xls2csv component is present on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patches if available; otherwise, implement input validation and error handling in the xls2csv component to properly check for NULL pointers before dereferencing, or run Catdoc in a sandboxed environment to limit crash impact.
catdoc version 0.96 or later (check official releases for latest stable version)
- 1. Check the current installed version of catdoc: catdoc --version
- 2. Identify the latest stable release of catdoc from the official repository or releases page (e.g., GitHub releases)
- 3. Download the latest stable catdoc release (version 0.96 or later)
- 4. Compile and install the new version following the standard build process: ./configure && make && make install
- 5. Verify the installation and confirm the version: catdoc --version
- 6. Test the xls2csv functionality with previously problematic files to confirm the NULL pointer dereference is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-41633 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-41633 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data