CVE-2023-41703
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUser ID references at mentions in document comments were not correctly sanitized. Script code could be injected to a users session when working with a malicious document. Please deploy the provided updates and patch releases. User-defined content like comments and mentions are now filtered to avoid potentially malicious content. No publicly available exploits are known.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in document comment functionality where user ID references in mentions were not properly sanitized, allowing script code injection that executes in other users' sessions when viewing malicious documents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.10.6> 7.10.6, < 8.20= 7.10.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Open Xchange Appsuite installationIdentify if the Open Xchange Appsuite platform is deployed in your environment. Check for OX-specific processes, services, or web interfaces typically accessible on ports 8009 or 443.Affected if Open Xchange Appsuite is installed and running.
-
Determine installed Appsuite versionLocate the version information for your OX Appsuite installation. This is typically available in the admin interface, package manager, or configuration files. Compare your installed version against the affected ranges: versions < 7.10.6, = 7.10.6, and >= 7.10.7 but < 8.20 are vulnerable.Affected if Your installed version is 7.10.6, or is lower than 7.10.6, or falls between 7.10.7 and 7.x (including 7.10.7 through 7.x) up to but not including 8.20.
-
Confirm document comment feature is accessibleDetermine whether users have access to document collaboration features that allow commenting on documents and using @mentions to reference other users.Affected if Document commenting and mention functionality is enabled for users in your deployment.
-
Inspect for existing malicious commentsReview recent documents and their associated comments for suspicious content, particularly mentions containing script tags or JavaScript event handlers in the user reference fields.Affected if Documents contain comments with unsanitized user mentions that could contain injected script code.
You are affected if Open Xchange Appsuite is running and your installed version is below 8.20 while the document comment and mention features are enabled for users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.10.68.20
Deploy vendor-provided security updates and patch releases; ensure content filtering is enabled for user-defined content like comments and mentions.
Open Xchange Appsuite version 8.20 or later (or the latest 7.10.6+ patch if remaining on 7.10.x branch)
- Review the Open Xchange Appsuite release notes for version 8.20 and any intermediate patch releases
- Plan maintenance window for the upgrade procedure
- Backup current installation and database
- Upgrade Open Xchange Appsuite to version 8.20 or later
- Verify that document comments and mentions functionality works correctly after upgrade
- Test that XSS filtering is applied to user-generated content in comments and mentions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,384.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-41703 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-41703 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data