Pandora FmsApplication · Artica

CVE-2023-41807

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-11-23
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 773 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Pandora FMS on all allows Privilege Escalation. This vulnerability allows a user to escalate permissions on the system shell. This issue affects Pandora FMS: from 700 through 773.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Pandora FMS that allows authenticated users to escalate their privileges and gain shell access on the underlying system. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation or enforcement of privilege boundaries in versions 700 through 773, enabling a user with standard privileges to execute commands with elevated system-level permissions.

MitigationUpgrade Pandora FMS to a version beyond 773 that includes the security patch for this vulnerability. Until an upgrade is possible, restrict user permissions to the minimum required and monitor system access logs for suspicious shell command execution.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Pandora FmsApplication
Affected:>= 700, <= 773

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Pandora FMS version
    Locate the Pandora FMS installation directory and check the version file, or run the command: pandora_manage /path/to/pandora_server.conf --version, or check the web interface footer for the version number.
    Affected if The installed version is 700, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713, 714, 715, 716, 717, 718, 719, 720, 721, 722, 723, 724, 725, 726, 727, 728, 729, 730, 731, 732, 733, 734, 735, 736, 737, 738, 739, 740, 741, 742, 743, 744, 745, 746, 747, 748, 749, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754,
  2. Verify command execution feature status
    Check the Pandora FMS configuration file (usually pandora_server.conf) for the parameters related to shell command execution, or inspect the Enterprise/web console for any command execution or shell access plugins/modules that may be enabled.
    Affected if The command execution, shell access, or any feature allowing arbitrary command execution is enabled and accessible to standard authenticated users.
  3. Review user privilege assignments
    Log into the Pandora FMS console as an administrator and navigate to the user management section. Examine which users have standard privileges versus elevated administrative roles.
    Affected if There exist users with standard (non-administrator) privileges in the system who could potentially access the vulnerable feature.
  4. Inspect access logs for suspicious activity
    Review Pandora FMS server and web access logs for entries showing command execution, shell invocations, or privilege escalation attempts from standard user accounts.
    Affected if Logs show command execution or shell access performed by users who should only have standard privileges.

You are affected if Pandora FMS version is between 700 and 773 inclusive, and standard authenticated users have access to features that allow command execution or shell access on the underlying system.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 773
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Pandora FMS to a version beyond 773 that includes the security patch for this vulnerability. Until an upgrade is possible, restrict user permissions to the minimum required and monitor system access logs for suspicious shell command execution.

Fix this in Pandora Fms Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-41807 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-41807 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data