Laposta Signup BasicWordPress extension · Laposta
CVE-2023-41950
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Laposta - Roel Bousardt Laposta Signup Basic plugin <= 1.4.1 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Laposta Signup Basic WordPress plugin versions 1.4.1 and below. The plugin lacks proper anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on state-changing operations, allowing attackers to trick authenticated administrators into unknowingly submitting malicious requests to modify plugin settings or perform actions within the plugin.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Laposta Signup BasicWordPress extension
< 1.4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Laposta Signup Basic plugin is installedCheck your WordPress installation's wp-content/plugins directory for a folder named 'laposta-signup-basic' or 'laposta' and look for the main plugin PHP file containing the plugin header with the version number.Affected if The plugin folder exists in the WordPress plugins directory.
-
Determine the installed versionOpen the main plugin file (usually index.php or laposta-signup-basic.php) and read the 'Version:' field from the plugin header comment at the top of the file.Affected if The version number shown is 1.4.1 or lower.
-
Locate state-changing operations in the plugin codeSearch the plugin PHP files for form tags (form method="post"), admin_init hooks, admin_post hooks, and any PHP code handling POST or GET requests that modify data.Affected if The plugin contains form submissions or admin action handlers.
-
Inspect for missing nonce verificationExamine each state-changing operation found and check whether wp_nonce_field, wp_nonce_url, check_admin_referer, or check_ajax_referer functions are called before any data modification occurs.Affected if Any form submission or admin action handler performs data changes without first verifying a nonce token.
Your environment is affected if the Laposta Signup Basic plugin is installed with version 1.4.1 or below and contains state-changing operations (forms or admin actions) that lack nonce verification.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.4.2
Update the Laposta Signup Basic plugin to the latest version if available, or implement WordPress nonces on all form submissions and admin actions within the plugin code.
1.4.2
- Upgrade the Laposta Signup Basic plugin to version 1.4.2 or later
- After upgrading, verify that the plugin functions correctly on the site
- Test that forms and submissions work as expected after the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Fix this in Laposta Signup Basic
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-41950 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-41950 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data