CVE-2023-41964
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe BIG-IP and BIG-IQ systems do not encrypt some sensitive information written to Database (DB) variables. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceF5 BIG-IP and BIG-IQ systems store certain sensitive data in unencrypted form within database variables, potentially exposing this data to unauthorized access with network adjacency requirements. The exact sensitive information affected and complete exploitation details are not fully specified in the available description.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or check the BIG-IP web console System > About page for the exact version numberAffected if The version falls within 13.1.0-13.1.5, 14.1.0-14.1.5, 15.1.0-15.1.8, or 16.1.0-16.1.3
-
Determine enabled BIG-IP modulesRun 'tmsh list sys module' to list all installed and enabled modules such as APM, AFM, ASM, Analytics, AAM, AVR, or CGNATAffected if Any of the following modules are enabled: Access Policy Manager, Advanced Firewall Manager, Advanced Web Application Firewall, Analytics, Application Acceleration Manager, Application Security Manager, Application Visibility and Reporting, or Carrier Grade NAT
-
Verify database encryption configurationInspect the internal database variables for sensitive data storage. Use 'tmsh show sys db' or access the underlying database configuration to review whether encryption is enabled for sensitive database variablesAffected if Sensitive database variables are found to be stored in unencrypted or plaintext form
-
Review database access controlsCheck database access control lists and user permissions for database access. Run 'tmsh list auth user' and review database access policies to determine who can query internal database variablesAffected if Users or roles with network adjacency can access sensitive database variables without proper encryption-based restrictions
You are affected if your BIG-IP version is within the listed ranges AND you have any of the affected modules enabled, with sensitive data stored unencrypted in database variables accessible via network adjacency.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.1.916.1.4
Review database access controls and audit logs for unauthorized access to sensitive DB variables. Apply available F5 patches and implement additional compensating controls such as network segmentation and strict access controls until official fixes are deployed.
Upgrade to BIG-IP 15.1.9+ (for 15.1.x branch) or 16.1.4+ (for 16.1.x branch); older branches (13.1.x, 14.1.x) should migrate to a supported fixed version
- 1. Identify the currently installed BIG-IP version using 'tmsh show sys version' or the web management console.
- 2. Based on your current version branch, plan the upgrade path: if on 13.1.x or 14.1.x, upgrade to a supported later branch (15.1.9+ or 16.1.4+); if on 15.1.x, upgrade to 15.1.9 or later; if on 16.1.x, upgrade to 16.1.4 or later.
- 3. Review F5 release notes and upgrade guides for the target version at support.f5.com to understand prerequisites and procedure.
- 4. Perform a full backup of the BIG-IP configuration before upgrading.
- 5. Download the target version ISO from F5 Downloads (my.f5.com) and upload to the BIG-IP system.
- 6. Follow F5 upgrade procedure: boot from the ISO or use the upgrade wizard in the web management console, or use 'tmsh install sys software' with the uploaded volume.
- 7. After upgrade, verify the system is operational and confirm sensitive DB variables are now encrypted as part of the security fix.
- 8. Validate that all critical services and access policies are functioning correctly post-upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-41964 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-41964 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data